On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14:27AM -0800, Grant wrote: > I'm doing all of my testing with net-wireless/broadcom-sta. > > package.license seems to unmask the package which otherwise won't > emerge. ACCEPT_LICENSE does negate the need manually accept the > license. So they seem to perform different functions. skype will > still emerge without package.license? Maybe there's a difference in > the license which is responsible for the different behavior?
That's odd. You say that ACCEPT_LICENSE negates the need to manually accept the license, yet package.license does not? You should file a bug about this: per 'man portage' package.license This will allow ACCEPT_LICENSE to be augmented for a sin‐ gle package. Format: - comment lines begin with # (no inline comments) - one DEPEND atom per line followed by additional licenses or groups I read this to mean that they should behave the same way. The design philosophy of ACCEPT_LICENSE vs package.license seems to be the same as ACCEPT_KEYWORD vs package.keyword ... Curious. W -- Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton