On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:14:27AM -0800, Grant wrote:
> I'm doing all of my testing with net-wireless/broadcom-sta.
>
> package.license seems to unmask the package which otherwise won't
> emerge. ACCEPT_LICENSE does negate the need manually accept the
> license. So they seem to perform different functions. skype will
> still emerge without package.license? Maybe there's a difference in
> the license which is responsible for the different behavior?
That's odd. You say that ACCEPT_LICENSE negates the need to manually
accept the license, yet package.license does not? You should file a
bug about this: per 'man portage'
package.license
This will allow ACCEPT_LICENSE to be augmented for a sin‐
gle package.
Format:
- comment lines begin with # (no inline comments)
- one DEPEND atom per line followed by additional licenses or groups
I read this to mean that they should behave the same way.
The design philosophy of ACCEPT_LICENSE vs package.license seems to be the same
as ACCEPT_KEYWORD vs package.keyword ...
Curious.
W
--
Willie W. Wong [email protected]
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire
et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton
