dear all,

On 06/02/2010 13:32, Jonathan Gray [jonathan.g...@okfn.org] wrote:
   (i) If anyone is interested in joining a small informal group
focusing on CKAN's support for geodata and geospatially referenced
data - please drop me a line!

Also to note - I'm planning to draft a funding proposal on using open geodata to link and integrate research data, which could take in minimal metadata for CKAN packages of geodata, as well as OpenSearch Geo, and involve several projects implementing the same interfaces.

Now I'm thinking of GeoCommons.com which has done a lot in the way of minimal metadata and simple API search. How much free value can be extracted from it or given back to it?

I had a play around with the uploader. I'm wondering about the lack of licensing clarity in GeoCommons.

I uploaded a test shapefile that I found in a django test directory.
There were options to add metadata describing where the data came form, original source URLs, source authors and maintainers.
I wasn't asked to add a description of data openness.

In the boilerplate of the website there is a statement that "This data is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License".
I wasn't asked to agree to this license while uploading data.

The upload app has a lovely second phase where you are prompted to join this dataset to a number of in-built boundary files, or to geocode it by picking the columns with addresses or placenames in, for better instant gratification analysis visuals.

However some of the sets of pre-cut boundary shapes are from gadm.org - the GADM download page states "This dataset is freely available for academic and other non-commercial use. Redistribution, or commercial use, is not allowed without prior permission."

Now this is not the first time I have seen GADM redistributed under an open license. But it would be good to be clear - there are some applications in which data openness is not negotiable.

Also, like Oscar, I would like to be able to search a geodata collection at shape level, not just package level.

cheers,


jo
--



_______________________________________________
geo-discuss mailing list
geo-discuss@lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss

Reply via email to