I'm cool with it, just a question but would it be that difficult, ugly to support both? I don't think there is a lot of code that does https, maybe a simple ifdef ? If it does seem difficult or ugly feel free to replace the code.
Keith Preston On 8/21/07, Jussi Kukkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Santtu had some valid points here (thanks for the input). Especially > async and https support might be useful at some point -- still, I > decided to try the nanohttp route for this release of maemo packages at > least. Porting was easy (and should be easy if we ever want to go back), > so I think I'll push this change to fd.o if everything seems to work out > fine and no-one has objections. > > > Some details: > * nanohttp should pick up proxy settings automatically (so the code is > somewhat smaller), but I haven't tested that -- let me know if it > doesn't work. > > * soup apparently does some uri escaping itself. With nanohttp one has > to use xmlURIEscapeStr() or similar when user input is accepted. > > -jussi > > > _______________________________________________ > GeoClue mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/geoclue > > >
_______________________________________________ GeoClue mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/geoclue
