http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/research/35590

Aug 29, 2008

Wildfire smoke could protect Arctic from warming
Smoke from northern forest fires may help cool the Arctic for several weeks to 
months at a time, according to a detailed analysis by researchers at NOAA and 
the University of Colorado in the US. Smoke in the atmosphere temporarily 
reduces the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface – an effect 
that could partly offset some of the warming caused by greenhouse gases and 
other pollutants.

The amount of solar energy "blocked" depends on how thick the smoke is, how far 
the Sun is above the horizon and the brightness of the Earth's surface, says 
team leader Robert Stone.

Stone's team calculated the effects of numerous wildfires that occurred in 
Alaska and western Canada in 2004 on short-term climate in the Arctic. Data was 
collected at Barrow in Alaska as part of ongoing efforts by NOAA to monitor 
geophysical variables critical to understanding climate change in the region. 
Other measurements, such as LIDAR, were made at a nearby US Department of 
Energy site. 

"Specifically, we use one-minute resolved solar radiation data to quantify the 
impact of boreal smoke on the surface radiation budget in terms of a quantity 
called 'aerosol optical depth' (AOD),” explained Stone. “This is a measure of 
the turbidity, or opacity, of the atmosphere because of wildfire smoke." 

The researchers also simulated the smoke using radiative transfer models – the 
results compare well with empirical results obtained. They used the model to 
study different scenarios and conditions that cannot be measured, such as smoke 
over open water and effects from smoke in the upper atmosphere. Stone says that 
the aerosols in the smoke tend to warm the layers in which they reside, while 
cooling the surface at the same time.

Despite helping to cool the Arctic, Stone stresses that smoke should not be 
exploited in "geoengineering" experiments to cool the planet until more 
information is available. However, he does point out that the new study 
supports the idea that injections of aerosols into the stratosphere "could 
provide the kind of cooling effect that may someday be needed to offset 
greenhouse warming". The aerosols would need to be smaller in size and persist 
for very long periods to make this economically feasible, and the effects of 
cloud-aerosol interactions must be taken into account as the aerosols 
eventually fall through the lower atmosphere.

The work is a first step towards Arctic-wide assessments of how aerosols 
transported to the Arctic from lower latitudes impact the region's climate. It 
could help improve Arctic climate models that are currently prone to large 
uncertainties, said Stone.

Using the same methodology, the team is now analysing the impact of Arctic haze 
(mostly from industrial pollutants) that accumulates in the Arctic each winter 
and spring. The researchers will also study flow or circulation patterns that 
determine how aerosols are distributed in the Arctic. "We will work with 
scientists who are quantifying all these processes and attempt to project 
scenarios of how forcing by aerosols will change in a warming climate," added 
Stone.

The effects of dust from Asian deserts, which has nearly twice the cooling 
effect of smoke and is transported to the Arctic all year round, also need to 
be studied further, says Stone. How this dust interacts with clouds and affects 
the radiation budget at the surface is not well understood -- or taken into 
account when modelling the climate.

The work was published in the Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres.

About the author
Belle Dumé is a contributing editor to environmentalresearchweb.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to