http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/reintroducing-extinct-species-parallels-with-geoengineering-4612

Reintroducing ‘extinct’ species - Parallels with Geoengineering?
October 3rd, 2008 
Posted by: David Bruggeman 

In the same issue of Wired that Steve Raymer appears in, there’s an interesting 
article about efforts to reintroduce species to areas where they (or their 
closest biological cousins) roamed thousands of years ago.  Granted, I’m not 
the Prometheus writer best suited to speak to this, but I think there are some 
interesting parallels between efforts like those described in “Pleistocene 
Park: Where the Auroxen Roam” and geoengineering proposals like those discussed 
in a Time article from last year: seeding the oceans with iron, placing mirrors 
in orbit, or other schemes worthy of science fiction (a Star Trek: The Next 
Generation episode did mention atmospheric scrubbers, but as a plot point and 
not a policy suggestion).

I want to know whether I have perceived something correctly about this issue.  
While the article at best implies this, it would appear that these efforts to 
reintroduce long absent megafauna (such as bison and primitive horses) are 
somewhat different than the efforts to reintroduce other species (such as the 
recent reintroduction of wolves to the Yellowstone region), or the efforts to 
fight invasive species.  Given the size of the animals involved, the time gap 
between disappearance and re-introduction, and the significant travel distances 
involved, this appears to be a different scope of intervention than fighting 
the spread of snakefish in the Potomac or reintroducing various smaller species 
into the wild.  The level of potential impact, and the kind of control 
required, seem qualitatively different.  There is also a bit of presumption 
that these efforts would produce some natural/wild state - something hard to 
assess given the lack of records from when these animals roamed large and free. 
 The lack of engagement with policy implications is disappointing, but not 
surprising.

The reintroduction of megafauna reminds me of geoengineering proposals 
occasionally thrown about as ways to address various global ills, climate 
change being one of them.  Roger has some concerns with how geoengineering has 
been used in climate change discussions, and it seems to me that the lack of 
consideration of policy, scientific and technical considerations is very 
similar to what is going on with these efforts to shape or engineer ecosystems. 
 Both geoengineering and megafauna reintroduction - as currently handled - so 
both a lack of deep thinking and an unearned faith in technological fixes.  I 
am not suggesting that the ideas are without merit. I want to make the point 
that some experiments, by their very nature, cannot be held in laboratory 
conditions and require a lot more consideration beyond the proper experimental 
protocol.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 3rd, 2008 at 7:08 pm and is filed 
under Author: Bruggeman, D., Biodiversity, Environment. You can follow any 
responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or 
trackback from your own site. 

One Response to “Reintroducing ‘extinct’ species - Parallels with 
Geoengineering?”
  1 
  1..  Mark Bahner Says: 
  October 3rd, 2008 at 10:14 pm 
  I don’t see the problem. With 19th century technology, it took only a few 
decades to nearly render the American bison extinct. 

  So if the megafauna don’t work, just kill them all. It’s not like they can 
hide.

  P.S. I don’t see how “seeding the oceans with iron” is worthy of Star Trek. 
The technology to do so was probably available even in the 19th century.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Attachment: 618ce948f7ac5067e65c54869a62a28d?s=32&d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D32&r=G
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to