Hi, this article is best on the subject to your query:
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/07/carbon.emissions.targets
 
It appears also as a text below. (Google will produce more repots on it.)
 
rgs, albert
 



Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:00:53 -0700From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
Re: [geo] Re: Fight Climate Change with DepressionCC: 
[email protected]
definitely curious to see the fireworks if the committee's recommendations are 
accepted.  have you seen any articles commenting on the resolve towards 
stricter standards here in light of the financial crisis, or even in light of 
the recent guardian expose?d
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Albert Kallio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Dan, UK Government has raised the emissions cut target to 80%, inclusive of 
aviation and marine activities despite banking mayhem.  So all is not bad, and 
matter is not forgotten here in UK. Rgs, albert> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:28:19 
+0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [From: Veli 
Albert Kallio] End use of fossil fuels in 20 years, UK warned> > Veli Albert 
Kallio spotted this on the guardian.co.uk site and thought you should see it.> 
> To see this story with its related links on the guardian.co.uk site, go to 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/07/carbon.emissions.targets> > 
End use of fossil fuels in 20 years, UK warned> Juliette Jowit> Tuesday October 
7 2008> The Guardian> > > Britain must abandon using almost all fossil fuels to 
produce power in 20 years' time, the government's climate change watchdog will 
warn today.> > The independent Climate Change Committee will publish its advice 
to the government that the UK should set a 2050 target of cutting all 
greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% - including the emissions from 
aviation and transport, which were previously excluded. > > Because it is 
unlikely that emissions from aviation and shipping will be cut so dramatically, 
other sectors, particularly power generation, would have to reduce emissions by 
much more, with big increases in energy efficiency, wind and tide power, and 
probably new nuclear generators, Lord Turner of Ecchinswell, the committee 
chairman, told the Guardian. > > "We have to almost totally decarbonise the 
power sector by 2030, well before 2050," he said.> > The committee will say the 
far-reaching changes would cost about 1-2% of the value of the economy in 2050, 
although growth would still be strong. "Rather than be twice present levels, 
[gross domestic product] would be 1 or 2% less than that," added Turner.> > In 
his speech to the Labour party conference last month, Gordon Brown hinted that 
the government would accept the new target when it responds, possibly within 
days, although it is not clear if it will accept the full report.> > Last night 
Ed Miliband, the new energy and climate secretary, said he welcomed the report. 
"We need to act now to avoid dangerous climate change and the action we take 
must be guided by experts. This is a pressing issue and we'll respond to the 
recommendations swiftly. The hard work will be for us all to make emission 
reductions a reality over the coming decades."> > If the report is accepted in 
full, campaigners said the UK target would be the most ambitious legally 
binding commitment of any country and would give the UK a strong position in 
international negotiations about a new global plan.> > "It would mean finally 
the government would accept the advice of scientists," said Martyn Williams, 
climate change campaigner for Friends of the Earth. "We could say to people in 
international negotiations: you can do what we're doing, not just what we're 
saying."> > However, Williams warned that in future the commitment to include 
aviation and shipping must also be made legally binding. "If the government 
[did] not accept a mechanism to make sure they and other governments were held 
to account, then we'd have to wonder if there was any confidence it would have 
to be delivered," he said.> > The Climate Change Committee was set up by the 
climate change bill and was asked to advise government on whether to increase 
the target of a 60% cut in carbon emissions by 2050.> > Today's report will say 
the new target must be "at least 80%" and extend it to include other greenhouse 
gas emissions such as methane and nitrous oxide. International aviation and 
shipping should not be part of the legally binding interim "budgets" that the 
committee will report on each year but should be a national target, and would 
"absolutely end up with an equal level of scrutiny", said Turner.> > In the 
first decade the biggest change would be a big expansion of energy efficiency 
and in the second decade of renewable energy. Such a "radical" change was 
"do-able" but could also require new nuclear power, and carbon capture and 
storage (CCS) technology for coal-fired power stations and industries like 
cement and steel, both of which will be seen as controversial by environmental 
campaigners. "It's possible to do it while knocking out particular technologies 
[like nuclear or CCS], it just gets significantly costly and more difficult to 
do," said Turner.> > Longer term, zero-carbon electricity would also have to be 
used to power cars and heat homes, says the report. > > The report will 
increase pressure to abandon controversial plans for new coal-fired power 
stations in the UK before CCS is available at that scale. Ministers have 
previously admitted full-scale CCS might not happen before 2050. Turner said 
the committee's opinion would be published in a more detailed report in 
December. > > The December report will also recommend interim targets up to 
2022 and the impact of different industry sectors.> > Copyright Guardian 
Newspapers Limited 2008> > If you have any questions about this email, please 
contact the guardian.co.uk user help desk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Make a mini you and download it into Windows Live Messenger
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to