Radio has Rush Limbaugh.  FOX has O'Reilly.  And CNN?  All they could afford is 
Glenn Beck.

http://www.edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/24/gb.01.html

GLENN BECK

Obama Speaks in Germany; Will Russia Control Oil in the North Pole?

Aired July 24, 2008 - 19:00:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE 
UPDATED.

BECK: Coming up, a professor at our beloved Columbia University has invented a 
device that actually sucks CO2 out of the atmosphere. It cleans the atmosphere 
of carbon dioxide. Well, you would think that Al Gore and the environmental 
crowd would be behind this thing 100 percent and be throwing a party. They`re 
not. Why? Answer, tonight`s "Real Story." 
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

BECK: We have a lot of authors on this program, but not all of them had sold 
over 150 million books on their own. Best-selling author, James Patterson`s new 
book called "The Dangerous Days of Daniel X;" he stops by to tell me about it, 
coming up in just a second.

But, welcome to "The Real Story" first. One of my main points on the global 
warming crisis has simply been let`s not overreact and do stupid things. If you 
haven`t noticed we`re overreacting and that usually creates bubbles, and 
bubbles lead to bursting of bubbles. And let`s take a look to see what happened 
to the Internet stocks and the real estate market, if you need proof, that`s 
not a good idea.

We don`t need to drop trillions of dollars on new cap in trade or dumb tax 
schemes. We don`t need short cited ideas like dumping iron ore or now it`s lime 
into the oceans. The real story is that climate change, just like almost every 
other problem, can be solved by getting the politicians and the special 
interest groups out of the way of the entrepreneurs.

Politicians, shoo, shoo. People, people, the rich, they are the ones who 
understand virtually every millionaire in this country made money by solving a 
problem that seemed insurmountable to others. That`s how the rich got rich. 
That`s how America became America. We dream. I trust you, not the politicians. 
[What about the rich environmentalists?  AG]

Right now in Tucson, Arizona, a Colombia University physicist named Klaus 
Latner [Lackner.  AG]  is working on an amazing device. It`s a CO2 scrubber. It 
could remove one ton of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere every single day. 
Now, you produce about 18 tons of carbon dioxide a year. Could you imagine what 
this could do? It doesn`t filter out new CO2 from factories, other technology 
exists to that.

This scrubs out existing CO2, which means it has the potential to take us back 
to pre-industrial age carbon levels without giving up anything; without giving 
up cars; without turning off our air conditioners or paying some ridiculous 
amount of our incomes to some new government agency. [Hey Glenn, you financial 
genius.  Who would pay for all the air capture systems?  Hank Paulson?  AG]

The scrubber, which is still in development now, it means that removing one ton 
of carbon a day is likely just the beginning because it`s still in development. 
Remember, remember the first computers, we used to watch them, as kids on -- 
remember Willy Wonka, when he -- I`m now asking the machine where the last 
Wonka bar is.

They`re as big as a house. Even Al Gore understands the technology always gets 
better, faster and cheaper. In fact, he used this argument himself on "Meet the 
Press" last weekend.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

AL GORE, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Think about what happened 
in the computer revolution. That -- we saw cost reductions for silicon computer 
chips of 50 percent every year and a half for the last 40 years. We`re now 
beginning to see the same kind of sharp cost reductions as the demand grows for 
solar cells.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BECK: Ok, he`s half right, which is about half as right as he usually is. 
Gore`s Law doesn`t apply just to solar cells but to all technologies. They get 
better, and they get cheaper as they approach singularity and then, boom, 
you`re off to the races, including the CO2 scrubber.

Yet, Al Gore is not happy about the CO2 scrubber. Environmental groups are 
opposed to the idea of a CO2 scrubber. Why is that? In fact, they oppose many 
of them, any technology that allows us to continue to live with fossil fuels. 
Hah. It`s almost like somebody on this program has been saying that for quite 
some time. [I really haven't seen any comments from Gore on air capture and 
very little from "environmental groups."  AG]

The truth is climate change is nothing but a smoke screen for what these people 
really want; and that is power. It`s -- their motivated by greed, money, 
controlling every single aspect of your life. That is their real agenda. Why 
don`t the rest of us work on the CO2 problem?

Sterling Burnett is the senior fellow at the National Center for Policy 
Analysis.

Sterling, this scrubber, I heard about this, this morning. I can`t believe if 
the world is really concerned about CO2 that this isn`t on the front page of 
every single newspaper in America. We should be investing, investors. You want 
to solve the problem, go invest in this company.

STERLING BURNETT, NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS: Well, it`s really out 
there for a month. It`s been out there for months, they have been talking about 
it but as you say, nowhere on the front page.

The "New York Times" hasn`t covered it. "Washington Post" isn`t covering it. 
It`s a -- you have to find it on YouTube. I will say "60 Minutes" did a story 
on it last month.

But -- because, as you`ve already rightly identified, Glenn, the 
environmentalists, and they`re the ones driving the global warming whip, 
they`re not really concerned about CO2. They`re concerned about people`s 
lifestyles.

They want to control -- they have a vision of the world. And that vision, they 
continue to live in their pretty nicely appointed houses, and pay more for the 
cars that make them salve their conscience, and the poor people don`t do that 
well because their vision is a simpler lifestyle for everyone but them.

In the `80s, there was a t-shirt, a group called "Earth First." Had a model 
called "Back to the Pleistocene" well, they don`t go quite that far, but they 
really -- it`s about, as you said, controlling how people live. I don`t think 
it`s not about money. It`s about control.

BECK: Ok, you know what I have to tell you, I would invest in this company. I 
think there`s a lot of people who would invest in this company; or in new 
technologies. But you don`t -- you don`t trust the people who are fighting the 
global warming thing.

The cleanest energy we can find is nuclear energy. [HAHAHAHAHAHA.  AG] They 
don`t want it. CO2 scrubbers, they don`t want it.

BURNETT: Control.

BECK: Yes, you don`t trust them, so nobody will invest in this company, and 
then on the other side of that, you don`t trust government that government is 
not going to come in and stop that technology. So how do you get yourself out 
of it as an entrepreneur? [The government is going to stop Lackner from 
developing air capture?  AG]

BURNETT: It`s tough as an entrepreneur. I`m not even sure it`s part of a 
company yet. It`s really in the experimental stage.

But the question is, how far will the experiment be allowed to go forward? 
Because environmentalists are trying actively to stop this; their argument is 
not that we should remove CO2, but that we should stop using fossil fuels. 
[Don't need government to stop air capture research.  Environmentalists will do 
it.  AG]

BECK: Right, I will tell you that we called, and I think well, we hope that 
they`ll be on the air at some point. They do have a company; I think it`s with 
the new Wright Brothers, believe it or not. And I have to tell you, we`ll check 
this company out, and America, if this is true, this is one of the big, huge 
keys to the global warming problem. And it will open up every door; if that`s 
the real motivation.

BURNETT: There`s a variety of technologies out there. You sort of didn`t like 
the idea of iron filings in the ocean. I actually think it`s not a bad idea 
because it does a lot of other things that are good.

But Geo-engineering solutions -- proposed solutions have been out there for 
some time, but they`re always pooh-poohed, they`re always demeaned because they 
don`t get it what the environmentalists are really about.

If you want to reduce CO2 emissions, there are ways to do it that don`t force 
Americans to sacrifice their lifestyles, that don`t make the poor poorer, that 
don`t raise energy.

BECK: Right, thanks Sterling. By the way, just a note everybody always says 
that it`s big auto and oil that stopped all this technology. Well, here is new 
technology to scrub the air clean of CO2. Who is burying it? [No need to worry 
about "big auto" anymore.  AG]





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to