hi all,

I consulted with a few sea-ice wizards on the exchanges here related 
to Arctic trends, and Jennifer Francis at Rutgers weighed in with the 
following thoughts. Note the importance of the boundary layer changes 
as well. There are many important factors besides albedo and ocean 
solar absorption.

Winter cloudiness etc important factor. But also note the importance 
of not over-interpreting short-term wiggles as trends. Much more on 
Dot Earth and in my earlier coverage of the sea-ice question. This 
post (shortcut) is a good starting point: 
http://tinyurl.com/dotIceTrends

Here's jennifer's comment (I sent her that sea-ice graph that was 
making the rounds here)>



Hi Andy --

The first figure you attached with the extrapolation from the 2007 
summer ice loss is very unrealistic, in my opinion. Both the observed 
record and model simulations of ice extent exhibit a great deal of 
interannual variability, and most sea ice researchers would expect 
this behavior to continue superimposed on a continuing downward 
trend. Some years the decline will be dramatic, as it was in 2007, 
and some years there will likely be a recovery, as random atmospheric 
patterns act on the ice cover. What's different now as opposed to 2 
decades ago is that the ice is now so thin that any unusual forcing 
-- be it a persistent wind pattern, cloud cover, heat transfer from 
lower latitudes -- will have a much bigger effect on the ice, as thin 
ice is more easily moved by wind and/or melted by increased heating. 
The small ice cover of recent years allows more solar energy to be 
absorbed by the open surface during summer, but exactly how that 
extra heat affects
  the system over the following months is still being worked out. Some 
recent research suggests that during falls after low-ice summers the 
lower atmosphere warms, the atmospheric boundary layer gets deeper, 
and low clouds increase, all of which tend to retard regrowth of sea 
ice in the fall and early winter. It also appears there's a 
large-scale influence on winter weather patterns over much of the 
northern hemisphere. The reason I'm telling you all this is that it 
appears there is no obvious mechanism for the ice to rebound 
significantly unless there is a multi-year period of 
colder-than-normal temperatures, but this is not likely as greenhouse 
gases continue to increase at rates even faster than the most 
pessimistic IPCC scenario.

Regarding water temperatures, the main effect is through the added 
absorption of solar energy in summer, which accelerates the melt 
during late summer. Warmer winter temperatures in the Atlantic sector 
also appear to be responsible for most of the retreat of the ice edge 
during winter in that region, but not on the Pacific side.

Maybe this is more info that you needed and much of it you already 
know, but it's not a simple explanation. Regarding the shipping text 
you sent, it looks like a bunch of hooey to me. 51 ships in the area 
will not have a perceptible effect on the clouds. The "good" low 
clouds they're talking about are already almost 100% emissive of 
infrared energy, and adding ship smoke to them is not going to matter.

Hope this helps -- Happy New Year!!   
Jennifer

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jennifer Francis, Ph.D.
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University 
Co-Director of the Rutgers Climate and Environmental Change Initiative
74 Magruder Rd, Highlands NJ 07732 USA -- Tel: (732) 708-1217, Fax: 
(732) 872-1586
fran...@imcs.rutgers.edu | http://marine.rutgers.edu/~francis/

At 9:14 AM -0700 12/29/08, wig...@ucar.edu wrote:
>Re Arctic ice, the issue is not just albedo, but also thermai
>inertia. The effective heat capacity of the exposed ocean is
>hugely greater than the ice.
>
>Tom.
>
>++++++++++++++
>
>

-- 
Andrew C. Revkin
The New York Times / Science
620 Eighth Ave., NY, NY 10018
Tel: 212-556-7326 Mob: 914-441-5556
Fax:  509-357-0965
www.nytimes.com/revkin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to