It seems as though in vernacular plain English, it is. My inclination would be to change the jargon to avoid confusing the public unnecessarily. The deniers are doing plenty of that on their own.
On Jan 31, 10:42 am, David Schnare <[email protected]> wrote: > We have discussed this before. Solar radiation management is not > mitigation. It is a form of adaptation of limited use (several decades to > centuries) and no prevention to harm to oceans. Carbon sequestration (eg. > OIF) is a form of mitigation, but is not mitigation as defined by climate > activists. To them, the term is clearly defined as exclusively associated > with reduction of carbon emissions (actually greenhouse gas emissions). > > d. > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lockley > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > IPCC Working Group III and the U.S. Climate Change Science Program > > think that geoengineering is an aspect of mitigation. I always thought > > it was separate. > > > What's the consensus? > > > A > > -- > David W. Schnare > Center for Environmental Stewardship --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
