>4) What happens to methane sinks under conditions of bulk outgassing?

I only did a quick search when reading some of the previous discussion
here, so don't take this as solid at all.  But what I have in mind is
that the main process by which methane is destroyed could in principle
be overwhelmed, so that its half-life in the atmosphere would
increase.  Or rather, its kinetics would change so that it wouldn't
have a half-life but rather be removed at a rate that's a constant
plus a component proportional to its concentration.

On Feb 4, 9:28 pm, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
> After getting thoroughly shouted at, I realised I needed to improve my
> 'runaway' arguments.
>
> My current skeleton is below.  However, it's currently missing a few
> crucial bones which now need replacing.  I need citations for the
> following:
>
> 1)  A clathrate gun effect that shows rapid release?  Buffett and
> Archer, and Archer alone, show a slow release, although from a large
> reservoir.
> 2) A calculation of the eventual warming that may result from methane
> release from permafrost/clathrates.
> 3) A study showing the impacts of such a level of warming on human
> civilisation/survival.
> 4) What happens to methane sinks under conditions of bulk outgassing?
> Do they fail and massively increase the global warming potential of
> methane?
>
> We've discussed all these issues before, but I think it's now time to
> get any available research on the issue into the open.  Is there
> REALLY a big and immediate risk from the clathrate gun/permafrost?
>
> A
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_global_warming#Abrupt_climate...
>
> The scientific consensus in the [[IPCC Fourth Assessment Report]] is
> that "Anthropogenic warming could lead to some effects that are abrupt
> or irreversible, depending upon the rate and magnitude of the climate
> change."
>
> The phenomenon of [[Arctic shrinkage]] is leading some scientists to
> fear that a runaway climate change event may be
> imminent<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/oct/18/bookextracts.books</ref>,
> and may even have
> started<ref>http://www.terranature.org/environmentalCrisis.htm</ref>.
> There is an [[albedo]] effect, as white ice is replaced by dark ocean.
>  Rapid [[Arctic shrinkage]] is occurring, with 2007 being the lowest
> ever recorded area and 2008 being possibly the lowest ever recorded
> volume.<ref>http://nsidc.org/news/press/20081002_seaice_pressrelease.html</ref>
> This will induce or accelerate other [[positive feedback]] mechanisms,
> such as [[Arctic methane release]] from melting [[permafrost]] and
> [[clathrates]]. Lawrence et al(2008) suggests that a rapid melting of
> the sea ice may up a feedback loop that rapidly melts arctic
> permafrost.<ref>http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2008/permafrost.jsp</ref><ref>{{Citation
> | year=2008 | title=Accelerated Arctic land warming and permafrost
> degradation during rapid sea ice loss | first=David M. | last=Lawrence
> | first2=Andrew G. | last2=Slater | first3=Robert A. | last3=Tomas |
> first4=Marika M. | last4=Holland | first5=Clara | last5=Deser |
> journal=[[Geophysical Research Letters]] | volume=35 | issue=11 |
> doi=10.1029/2008GL033985 |
> url=http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/ccr/dlawren/publications/lawrence.grl.submit....}}</ref>
>
> Estimates of the size of the total carbon reservoir in Arctic
> [[permafrost]] and [[clathrates]] vary widely.  It is suggested that
> at least 900 gigatonnes of carbon in permafrost exists
> worldwide.<ref>http://www.terranature.org/methaneSiberia.htm</ref>{{fact}}.
>  Further, there are believed to be around and another 400 gigatonnes
> of carbon in methane clathrates in permafrost regions
> alone.<ref>http://www.springerlink.com/content/r4w867922g607w2j/</ref>.
>  Should this estimate of volume be correct or at least too low, and if
> clathrates are omitted from the analysis completely, then 900
> gigatonnes of carbon may potentially be released as methane as a
> result of human activity.  [[Methane]] is a potent [[greenhouse gas]]
> with a higher [[global warming potential]] than [[CO2]].  A release on
> this scale will create [[catastrophic climate change]].
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to