This puts geoengineering to cool the Arctic and save the Arctic sea ice in perspective.
We have to do it WITH EXTREME URGENCY to avoid the risk of unmitigated disaster, if the methane release were to accelerate... Emissions reductions will do nothing to cool the Arctic. But that is irrelevant. If we do not use geoengineering and manage to cool the Arctic, or at least halt its warming, then we're toast, whatever else we try and do. It's a simple message, and almost beyond dispute. Anybody want to dispute that now, after the scary math? Cheers, John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Whilden" <[email protected]> To: "geoengineering" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:51 PM Subject: [geo] Re: Arctic meltdown is a threat to humanity - scary math I'm glad this full story is finally being talked about in the medial. However, the true story is much, much worse. let's do some scary math: Historical total of human emissions of CO2: 1,800 GtCO2 (Canadell et al, PNAS 2007) Now let's compare this to what the Arctic methane will do... Estimate of total organic carbon reservoir in the permafrost: 1000 GtC (Zimov et al, Science 2006 - *note this excludes subsea methane clathrates) Converting to Arctic methane to CO2 equivalent (25x multiplier): 25,000 GtCO2 = 14x historical total human emissions Except that the 23x multiplier assumes a 100 year time horizon for normalizing methane's radiative forcing vs. CO2. In reality, we should use the IPCC's estimate of 72x for a 20 year time horizon, because this is a short-term threat. Converting to Arctic methane to CO2 equivalent (72x multiplier): 72,000 GtCO2 = 40x historical total human emissions Except, some scientists are saying that, "Large bursts of methane entering the atmosphere could have increased the atmospheric lifetime by decreasing the concentrations of the OH radicals that oxidize methane in today’s atmosphere.... A release significantly exceeding ten billion tonnes, delivered in less than a decade, could increase methane’s normal decadal lifetime by over half a century." (Nisbet et al, Nature Geoscience 2009 - http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v2/n3/full/ngeo454.html) So we need to do adjust our calculations again... multiply by another 5x. Converting to Arctic methane to CO2 equivalent (360x multiplier): 360,000 GtCO2 = 200x historical total human emissions (!!) Are you getting scared yet? I am.... Kevin Whilden On Mar 26, 10:59 am, "John Nissen" <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20127011.500-arctic-meltdown-is... > > Arctic meltdown is a threat to humanity > a.. 25 March 2009 by Fred Pearce > b.. Magazine issue 2701. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. > c.. For similar stories, visit the Climate Change Topic Guide > > I AM shocked, truly shocked," says Katey Walter, an ecologist at the > University of Alaska in Fairbanks. "I was in Siberia a few weeks ago, and > I am now just back in from the field in Alaska. The permafrost is melting > fast all over the Arctic, lakes are forming everywhere and methane is > bubbling up out of them." > > The permafrost is melting fast all over the Arctic, lakes are forming > everywhere and methane is bubbling out of them > > Back in 2006, in a paper in Nature, Walter warned that as the permafrost > in Siberia melted, growing methane emissions could accelerate climate > change. But even she was not expecting such a rapid change. "Lakes in > Siberia are five times bigger than when I measured them in 2006. It's > unprecedented. This is a global event now, and the inertia for more > permafrost melt is increasing." > The dramatic changes in the Arctic Ocean have often been in the news in > the past two years. There has been a huge increase in the amount of sea > ice melting each summer, and some are now predicting that as early as 2030 > there will be no summer ice in the Arctic at all. > Discussions about the consequences of the vanishing ice usually focus > either on the opening up of new frontiers for shipping and mineral > exploitation, or on the plight of polar bears, which rely on sea ice for > hunting. The bigger picture has got much less attention: a warmer Arctic > will change the entire planet, and some of the potential consequences are > nothing short of catastrophic. > Changes in ocean currents, for instance, could disrupt the Asian monsoon, > and nearly two billion people rely on those rains to grow their food. As > if that wasn't bad enough, it is also possible that positive feedback from > the release of methane from melting permafrost could lead to runaway > warming. > The danger is that if too much methane is released, the world will get > hotter no matter how drastically we slash our greenhouse gas emissions. > Recent studies suggest that emissions from melting permafrost could be far > greater than once thought. And, although it is too early to be sure, some > suspect this scenario is already starting to unfold: after remaining > static for the past decade, methane levels have begun to rise again, and > the source could be Arctic permafrost. > What is certain is that the Arctic is warming faster than any other place > on Earth. While the average global temperature has risen by less than 1 °C > over the past three decades, there has been warming over much of the > Arctic Ocean of around 3 °C. In some areas where the ice has been lost, > temperatures have risen by 5 °C. > This intense warming is not confined to the Arctic Ocean. It extends > south, deep into the land masses of Siberia, Alaska, Canada, Greenland and > Scandinavia, and to their snowfields, ice sheets and permafrost. In 2007, > the North American Arctic was more than 2 °C warmer than the average for > 1951 to 1980, and parts of Siberia over 3 °C warmer. In 2008, most of > Siberia was 2 °C warmer than average (see map). > Most of this is the result of positive feedbacks (see illustration) from > lost ocean ice, says David Lawrence of the National Center for Atmospheric > Research in Boulder, Colorado. His modelling studies show that during > periods of rapid sea-ice loss, warming extends some 1500 kilometres inland > from the ice itself. "If sea-ice continues to contract rapidly over the > next several years, Arctic land warming and permafrost thaw are likely to > accelerate," he says. > Changes in wind patterns may accelerate the warming even further. "Loss of > summer sea ice means more heat is absorbed in the ocean, which is given > back to the atmosphere in early winter, which changes the wind patterns, > which favours additional sea ice loss," says James Overland, an > oceanographer at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle. > "The potential big deal is that we now may be having a positive feedback > between atmospheric wind patterns and continued loss of sea ice." > Incidentally, the changing winds might also be to blame for some of the > cold and snowy weather in North America and China in recent winters, > Overland says. Unusual poleward flows of warm air over Siberia have > displaced cold air southwards on either side. > The rapid warming in the Arctic means that a global temperature rise of 3 > °C, likely this century, could translate into a 10 °C warming in the far > north. Permafrost hundreds of metres deep will be at risk of thawing out. > This is where things go global. The Arctic is not just a reflective mirror > that is cracking up. It is also a massive store of carbon and methane, > locked into the frozen soils and buried in icy structures beneath the > ocean bed. > A quarter of the land surface of the northern hemisphere contains > permafrost, permanently frozen soil, water and rock. In places, deep > permafrost that formed during the last ice age, when the sea level was > much lower, extends far out under the ocean, beneath the seabed. Large > areas of permafrost are already starting to melt, resulting in rapid > erosion, buckled highways and pipelines, collapsing buildings and > "drunken" forests. > The real worry, though, is that permafrost contains organic carbon in the > form of long-dead plants and animals. Some of it, including the odd > mammoth, has remained frozen for tens of thousands of years. When the > permafrost melts, much of this carbon is likely to be released into the > atmosphere. > No one knows for sure how much carbon is locked away in permafrost, but it > seems there is much more than we thought. An international study headed by > Edward Schuur of the University of Florida last year doubled previous > estimates of the carbon content of permafrost to about 1600 billion > tonnes - roughly a third of all the carbon in the world's soils and twice > as much as is in the atmosphere. > > Time bomb > Schuur estimates that 100 billion tonnes of this carbon could be released > by thawing this century, based on standard scenarios. If that all emerged > in the form of methane, it would have a warming effect equivalent to 270 > years of carbon dioxide emissions at current levels. "It's a kind of > slow-motion time bomb," he says. > One hotspot is the 40,000-year-old east Siberian permafrost region. It > alone contains 500 billion tonnes of carbon, says Philippe Ciais, co-chair > of the Global Carbon Project, a research network analysing the carbon > cycle. East Siberia was at times 7 °C warmer than normal during the summer > of 2007, he says. > Higher temperatures mean the seasonal melting of the upper layer of soil > extends down deeper than normal, melting the permafrost below. Microbes > can then break down any organic matter in the thawing layer, not only > releasing carbon but also generating heat that leads to even deeper > melting. The heat produced by decomposition is yet another positive > feedback that will accelerate melting, Ciais says. > What's more, if summer melting depth exceeds the winter refreezing level > then a layer of permanently unfrozen soil known as a talik forms, > sandwiched between the permafrost below and the winter-freezing surface > layer. "A talik allows heat to build more quickly in the soil, hastening > the long-term thaw of permafrost," says Lawrence. > The carbon in melting permafrost can enter the atmosphere either as carbon > dioxide or methane, which is a far more potent greenhouse gas, > molecule-for-molecule. If organic matter decomposes in the low-oxygen > conditions typical of the boggy soils and lakes in these regions, more > methane forms. > Researchers have been monitoring the Stordalen mire in northern Sweden for > decades. The permafrost there is melting fast and, as conditions become > wetter, it is releasing ever more methane into the air, says Torben > Christensen of Lund University in Sweden. This is the future for most of > the northern hemisphere's permafrost, he says. > It's not just existing boggy patches that are the problem. In low-lying > areas, the loss of volume as ice-rich permafrost melts leads to the > collapse of the ground and the formation of thermokarst lakes from the > meltwater. Satellite surveys show the number and area of these lakes is > increasing and, as the work by Walter and others shows, they could be a > major source of methane. > Put together, the latest research paints a disturbing picture. Since > existing models do not include feedback effects such as the heat generated > by decomposition, the permafrost could melt far faster than generally > thought. "Instead of disappearing in 500 years, the deepest permafrost > could disappear in 100 years," Ciais says. > The permafrost is not the only source of methane in the Arctic. Shallow > ocean sediments can be rich in methane hydrates, a form of ice containing > trapped methane. Particularly worrying are the huge amounts of methane > hydrate thought to lie beneath the Arctic Ocean. Because the waters here > are so cold, methane hydrates can be found closer to the surface than in > most other parts of the world. These shallow deposits are far more > vulnerable to the warming of surface waters. > Juergen Mienert at the University of Tromso in Norway, who has analysed > past eruptions of methane hydrates from the Arctic, says current > conditions are disturbingly similar to those in the past when warming > waters penetrated sediments, triggering the release of hydrates. "Global > warming will cause more blowouts, more releases," he says. > While shrinking sea ice in 2007 may have attracted all the headlines, some > researchers say what is really scaring them is a simultaneous jump in > methane levels. While the level of methane in the atmosphere has more than > doubled since pre-industrial times, for the past decade or so there has > been little change. > Then, in 2007, several million tonnes of extra methane mysteriously > entered the atmosphere. Detailed analysis from methane monitors around the > world suggests that much of it came from the far north. Ciais says it > looks like the biggest source was Siberian permafrost. > This is still contentious. Matt Rigby of the Center for Global Change > Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who has analysed the > methane surge, says we cannot yet say whether emissions from melting > permafrost contributed most to the rise. "But 2007 was unusually warm in > Siberia, and we would expect emissions increases when temperature rises," > he adds. > The rise could just be a blip - or the start of something big. "Once this > process starts, it could soon become unstoppable," Ciais says. > Walter agrees. Right now, she estimates, only a few tens of millions of > tonnes of methane are being emitted. "But there are tens of billions of > tonnes potentially available for release." And the faster the warming, the > faster the emissions will rise. > Most worrying of all is the risk of a runaway greenhouse effect. The > carbon stored in the far north has the potential to raise global > temperatures by 10 °C or more. If global warming leads to the release of > more greenhouse gases, these releases will cause yet more warming and > still more carbon will escape to the atmosphere. Eventually the feedback > process would continue even if we cut our greenhouse emissions to zero. At > that point climate change would be out of control. > There is another concern about Arctic melting: the growing amount of fresh > water flowing into the Arctic Ocean. The shrinking thickness and extent of > sea ice has added a huge amount of fresh water already. Meanwhile, rivers > are pouring up to 10 per cent more water into the ocean than they did half > a century ago. This is partly the result of rising precipitation as the > air warms - warmer air can hold more moisture - and partly the result of > melting permafrost, ice and snow. Yet more fresh water is coming from the > melting of the Greenland ice sheet. As the Arctic warms further, these > flows of fresh water will increase. > All this extra fresh water could weaken the pump that drives the > thermohaline circulation, or ocean conveyor current. Its most famous > element is the Gulf Stream in the North Atlantic, but the conveyor travels > all the oceans. It has its beginnings in the far north of the Atlantic, > off Greenland, where unusually dense water plunges to the ocean floor. The > water becomes dense here partly because it cools and partly because the > formation of sea ice increases salinity. As the water gets a bit warmer > and a bit less salty, thanks to all the extra fresh water, the worry is > that the pump could slow down. > Fears that the conveyor will soon shut down altogether, causing a fall in > temperatures in northern Europe, have receded. Models of the climate > system do not predict a shutdown any time within the next century, says > oceanographer Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact > Research in Germany. > > Monsoon warning > Even a slowdown in the conveyor could produce dramatic changes, though. > Climate models suggest that changes in the ocean conveyor will alter > rainfall patterns around the world. The models are backed by studies of > how the climate has changed during past shutdowns of the ocean conveyor. > The biggest consequence, says Buwen Dong of the Walker Institute for > Climate System Research at the University of Reading, UK, is likely to be > a disruption, and quite probably a complete collapse, of the Asian > monsoon, causing severe droughts in south Asia. "It could have enormous > social and economic impacts on these nations," he says. > > The disruption of the monsoon would have enormous social and economic > impacts in south Asia > > You can say that again. The Asian monsoon is the main source of water for > large areas of the most heavily populated continent. An estimated 2 > billion - getting on for 1 in 3 citizens on the planet - rely on it to > grow their food. Take away the monsoon and they would starve. All because > of warming in the Arctic. > Nobody can be sure how likely all this is. Indeed, the scientists at the > Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who compile its reports > cannot even reach agreement on how to quantify the probabilities of such > events. As a result, the "scary scenarios" were barely mentioned in the > last report. > Nonetheless, the latest findings suggest we cannot afford to ignore these > possibilities, especially given that everything to do with global climate > is linked. The loss of Arctic sea ice could lead to the release of ever > more methane from permafrost and methane hydrates. That in turn would make > a dramatic reduction in the strength of the ocean conveyor sometime this > century increasingly likely, which could lead to abrupt changes in the > Asian monsoon. > With the summer sea ice in the Arctic Ocean already shrinking much faster > than the IPCC models predicted, one thing is for sure. It is not just the > polar bears who should be worrying about the warming Arctic. > Fred Pearce is an environment correspondent for New Scientist --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
