Mostly about the impacts and possible mitigative measures to prevent a 2-degree 
C rise from pre-industrial by 2050.  In the last half hour, geoengineering 
technologies are briefly reviewed as extreme and "outlandish" means to avoid a 
3-degree increase which the program says would lead to catastrophic feedback 
induced warming via melting permafrost and ice sheets.  So the assumptions and 
predictions are about half those of Flannery's 6 degrees by 2100.  Six degrees 
results in human extinction.  Six degrees of permanent separation of Homo 
Sapiens from Earth.

John Holdren, now Obama's in-house science advisor (Al Gore has some role as 
well, but that still hasn't been explained) appears in several segments along 
with James Hansen who makes his standard, but vague statements about urgency 
and reducing emissions, this time endorsing CCS.  Holdren headed WHOI when the 
program was produced in 2008.

The Lackner artificial tree air capture idea is described with Lackner and 
Allen Wright (from Global Research Technologies, GRT, the now bankrupt company 
formed to develop and market the technology) discussing its origin.  Lackner 
first considered the idea when working on Biosphere II in AZ, a completely 
enclosed environmental test chamber.  Differs from the story he also tells 
about how his teenage daughter gave him the idea.

They first used NaOH, but found it was too corrosive and then adopted plastic 
sheets made from the material used in water softeners.  The sheets are 
impregnated with ion exchange resin.  The resin absorbs CO2 from ambient air.  
Recovery of the CO2 with Na2CO3 was tried and found to be too expensive to 
regenerate the carbonate, but then they found that water alone would extract 
the CO2 from the resin at a low energy cost.

The prototype system would be a rotating drum with panels containing the 
plastic sheets.  Recovery of the CO2 would be accomplished by spraying the 
panels with water, but how to dispose of the CO2 enriched water was not 
explained.  Each drum would remove 1 ton of CO2 per day and 60 million all 
current annual emissions with the potential to remove the legacy CO2 from the 
atmosphere.  Why not just pump the water into the ground?

With a 3-degree rise, permafrost and the Amazon rain forest are wiped out, the 
latter by fires.  Feedbacks from permafrost carbon dioxide and methane add to 
the woes.

The artificial increase of urban albedo and growing genetically modified 
reflective plants could offset 0.5W/m2 CO2 forcing according to Peter Cox at 
the Hadley Center.

Holdren says we need to look at the geoengineering options.

"Sulfur seeding" or "waging war on the planet's atmosphere" is introduced 
accompanied by ominous music, volcanic eruptions, little artillery shells being 
launched and Dr. Brian Hoskins from the UK saying that ozone depletion from 
this would be uncertain.  At least the music wasn't Flight of the Valkyries.

Cloud ships and mirrors in space (presented as in orbit) to reflect sunlight 
were briefly touched on and obviously inaccurately as the mirrors aren't 
mirrors, they aren't in orbit and they wouldn't reflect sunlight.  But they 
would be too expensive as noted.

Thus the geo options were mainly included as straw men to set up closing 
remarks by Holdren, Hansen and Nissen's latest proposed pen pal, Pachuri that 
to avoid the tipping points and the need to use geo we have to employ the 
technologies already available or will soon to solve the problem by 2015, when 
it is stated it will be too late to prevent a 2-degree C rise.  Now that he is 
on the other side of the Looking Glass, I wonder if Holdren wants to be held to 
the 2015 date?

In case you are wondering, I loaned my copy of the Owning the Weather movie to 
someone this weekend and will have comments on it and the movie premiere next 
week (if UNC wins).


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Alvia Gaskill 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:38 AM
  Subject: Hot Planet


  The promo for this shows Lackner and others describing the artificial trees.  
Somewhat misleading in that it suggests they are already being used.  Airs 
Sunday on the Science Channel and repeats.

  http://science.discovery.com/tv-schedules/special.html?paid=48.15725.25759.0.0

  Hot Planet 
    
  The effects of climate change -- massive storms, superfires and rising seas 
-- are potentially catastrophic. But they are not yet inevitable. This film 
looks at the future of global warming, and what man -- and science -- can still 
do to stop it.

  Apr 05, 9:00 pm

  (120 minutes)

  Apr 06, 12:00 am
  (120 minutes)

  Apr 07, 4:00 am

  (120 minutes)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to