I mentioned a paper by Mathews.  My error.  I meant Marshall and the
following paper:


MARSHALL, C.H. et al.  (2003)  “The Impact of Anthropogenic Land-Cover
Change on the Florida Peninsula Sea Breezes and Warm Season Sensible
Weather”, *Monthly Weather Review*,  V. 132 (2004).  See:
http://www.climatesci.org/publications/pdf/R-272.pdf



Pielke, et al. have done similar studies for the Northeast U.S., in
Australia and I think in the California agricultural valley.  He also
discussed some similar work on the west coast of Africa.  Add up enough of
this and it could have a significant effect on global temperature.  These
level of changes are not adequately reflected in the GCMs used by the IPCC,
according to Pielke.



d.


On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:54 PM, David Schnare <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually, land management probably should be taken into account by regional
> authorities.  Reforestation around Kilimejaro (sp?) would reestablish the
> snow cap up there fairly quickly.  Reestablishment of the swamps over 60
> percent of Florida will cool the state by "several" degrees and increase
> rainfall by 10 - 12% according to the Matthews et al study.  Similar
> opportunities exist in western Africa, Australia and no doubt many other
> places.  Should the planet continue to warm, regardless of the cause, land
> use may well be a part of adaptation necessary to maintain local temperature
> and precipitation.
>
> David.
>
>   On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Andrew Lockley <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Countries may well try to use such techniques as a may of meeting
>> obligations, or to justify not cutting GHGs.  We should be prepared for the
>> arguments.
>> A
>>
>> 2009/5/15 David Schnare <[email protected]>
>>
>>>   If we are going to get into albedo management, then we really would
>>> have to get into land management.  Pielke's work modeling the effects of
>>> land albedo in Florida and the North East demonstrate the massive effect of
>>> changing albedo.  Thus, if we are going to get into white roofs, it makes no
>>> sense but to get into an entire albedo budget.   Not sure there will ever be
>>> sufficient political opportunity to mandate land use practices as part of a
>>> climate change response.
>>>
>>> d.
>>>
>>>    On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Sam Carana <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Should albedo be taken into account in meeting CO2 emissions
>>>> reduction targets?"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my view:
>>>>
>>>> Geoengineering should not become a substitute for emission reductions.
>>>> Climate change requires a comprehensive response, consisting of at
>>>> least four parts:
>>>> - Emissions reduction
>>>> - Carbon stock management
>>>> - Heat transfer and radiation management
>>>> - Adaptation
>>>> All parts need to be adequately addressed and each of these parts
>>>> requires a separate and appropriate policy framework - details should
>>>> be worked out at the Copenhagen Conference.
>>>>
>>>> At the Copenhagen Conference, an agreement should be reached on
>>>> targets for "emission reduction". Each country can then decide how to
>>>> achieve their targets, provided they do reach them, which should be
>>>> backed up by sanctions against countries that fail to reach their
>>>> targets.
>>>>
>>>> The efforts of one country in one part, e.g., albedo change achieved
>>>> by white roofs, may deserve credit, but only as part of "radiation
>>>> management". Such credit should not translate into a reduction of to
>>>> duty for that country to reduce its emissions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>> Sam Carana
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David W. Schnare
>>>> Center for Environmental Stewardship
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> David W. Schnare
> Center for Environmental Stewardship
>



-- 
David W. Schnare
Center for Environmental Stewardship

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to