Hi James/Jim Are you replying to me or Peter? I'll assume me.
Where are you getting your 2.5% figure from? (Also, remember it's cumulative emissions, not annual emissions that count for anthropogenic warming, and that methane and F-gases are important also, especially the longer half life F-gases.) This may be helpful: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/category/climate-science/greenhouse-gases/langswitch_lang/in http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/144105.pdf http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/FAQ/wg1_faq-7.1.html http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/FAQ/wg1_faq-2.1.html And my point was not about greenhouse gases but particulates. In any case, my intention was to point to the need for cooling of some kind, regardless of the sources of GHGs. My understanding of this group is that it is for discussions about geoengineering, not a forum for arguments about anthropogenic versus natural warming, which can happen in many other places (and often does). And can you tell us a little about yourself? Your profile and postings and a google search of your name all throw up nothing. Ray On Jun 16, 5:37 pm, James F Burho <[email protected]> wrote: > I must ask--zero anthropogenic emissions? which is what, 2.5% of the > total? How do you plan to deal with the real heart of greenhouse gas > emission...forest fires (99% naturally occurring), vegetation decay, > volcanos, etc? > > Jim > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
