It is extremely disappointing to me that Biosphere Carbon Stock Management 
(BCSM) is not on the agenda

It provides the only practicable way of getting carbon out of the atmosphere 
while facilitating rapid reductions in emissions through substituting 
sustainably sourced biomass for fossil fuels.  

Decarbonizing is pie in the sky fostered by energy interests who want to put 
off change by a generation

Defossilizing (already taking place unsustainably in face of 'peak oil') can be 
accelerated, and subjected to sustainability conditions, tomorrow.  

There is no shortage of land but a great shortage of investment in land, as 
demonstrated by Len Ornstein and colleagues who show in an upcoming article in 
Climatic Change that desalinating seawater to irrigate the Sahara Desert for 
fast growing commercial forestry removes CO2 at lower cost than CCS.  The 
current policy-fixation with reducing fossil fuel emissions to the neglect of 
all other options is economic madness, adaptationally callous and 
environmentally perverse.  

Furthermore it imposes burden sharing on developing countries that are not 
historically responsible for the problem, whereas BCSM enmables them to gain 
from trade, exporting carbon credits and biofuels to industrialized countries.
 
I attach the 'springboard editorial comment' that I have been invited to 
provide for publication with Ornstein's two articles.  My earlier editorial 
essay on Biosphere Carbon Stock Management is available at 
http://www.springerlink.com/content/rt798740226381q8/fulltext.pdf  

Peter
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: John Nissen 
  To: Geoengineering 
  Cc: John Davies ; Alan Gadain ; John Shepherd ; Watson Robert Prof (ENV) ; 
Dan Lunt ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Brian Iddon ; 
Steve Rayner 
  Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 3:37 AM
  Subject: [geo] Geoengineering seminar, House of Commons, London, 15th July



  Event details here:
  http://www.iom3.org/events/geo-engineering-challenges-and-global-impacts 

  I fear that the potential side-effects of geoengineering (especially use of 
stratospheric aerosols) will be overstated, as they generally are by the media. 
 So I sincerely hope Dr Gadian and Dr Watson will not understate the 
potentially short-term global impact from not geoengineering: 

    a.. impact of Arctic warming (esp. methane release and Greenland ice sheet 
disintegration) if solar radiation management (SRM) is not used to cool the 
Arctic;

    b.. impact of increased CO2 (esp. global warming and ocean acidification) 
if CO2 air capture is not used to reduce its level below 350 ppm.


  BTW, I've just heard from Professor Shepherd that the Royal Society study on 
geoengineering is due out on Sept 1st, but will not include anything about 
using SRM specifically to cool the Arctic.

  Cheers from Chiswick,

  John

  ---

  The Institute of Physics, the Royal Society of Chemistry and The Royal 
Academy of
  Engineering invite you to attend a seminar entitled:

  Geo-engineering: Challenges and global impacts

  To be held at Portcullis House, the House of Commons
  15 July 2009
  Tea and coffee at 6:00pm.
  The seminar will commence at 6.30pm and will be followed by refreshments at 
8.15pm.

  The speakers at the seminar will be:
  Dr Alan Gadian, University of Leeds
  Talk: Cloud albedo modification
  Dr Dan Lunt, University of Bristol
  Talk: Sunshade engineering
  Prof. Andrew Watson, University of East Anglia
  Talk: Ocean fertilisation
  Prof. Steve Rayner, University of Oxford
  Talk: Social and ethical implications of geo-engineering
  Chair
  Dr Brian Iddon MP, the House of Commons


  Geo-engineering offers the potential to protect the Earth's ecosphere from 
the worst effects
  of climate change. This protection may only be temporary and, in some cases, 
mask the
  effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions rather than tackling the 
root cause.

  Nevertheless, with growing doubt as to the ability, or willingness, of world 
economies to
  meet the stringent cuts in emissions required, geo-engineering could become 
politically
  attractive to buy more time for those deep cuts to be made.

  This seminar will discuss a number of imaginative technologies that have been 
suggested to
  modify the Earth's albedo or sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide, which 
could be
  sufficient to offset, in part, the effect of greenhouse gas emissions. These 
include dispersing
  sulphate aerosols into the stratosphere to mimic global dimming, using a 
swarm of picosatellites
  in space to reflect sunlight, and ocean fertilisation to encourage the growth 
of
  marine microorganisms which can capture carbon dioxide. The seminar will 
explore whether
  these techniques will have any unintended consequences (e.g. releasing 
sulphate aerosols
  into the atmosphere may cause droughts), how they need to be developed and 
analysed for
  risk potential, and whether altering the Earth's climate system will ever be 
socially
  acceptable. The scale of the interventions required will also be of concern 
as well as the full
  life-cycle costs of proposals.

  This seminar is the latest in a series demonstrating key routes by which 
contemporary
  physics, chemistry and engineering will affect life in the 21st century.

  The Institute of Physics is a scientific charity devoted to increasing the 
practice,
  understanding and application of physics. It has a worldwide membership of 
over 36 000
  and is a leading communicator of physics-related science to all audiences, 
from specialists
  through to government and the general public. Its publishing company, IOP 
Publishing, is a
  world leader in scientific publishing and the electronic dissemination of 
physics.

  The Royal Society of Chemistry is the largest organisation in Europe for 
advancing the
  chemical sciences. Supported by a worldwide network of members and an 
international
  publishing business, our activities span education, conferences, science 
policy and the
  promotion of chemistry to the public.

  The Royal Academy of Engineering is Britain's national academy for 
engineering, bringing
  together the country's most eminent engineers from all disciplines to promote 
excellence in
  the science, art and practice of engineering. Its strategic priorities are to 
enhance the UK's
  engineering capabilities, to celebrate excellence and inspire the next 
generation, and to
  lead debate by guiding informed thinking and influencing public policy.

  ---


  



------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2214 - Release Date: 07/02/09 
05:54:00

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to