Peter

You can down load a copy by going to the site below my signature then 
browsing to /Climate change/data sources/Jones Hayward Boucher

It's too big to attach.

Stephen

Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design
School of Engineering and Electronics
University of Edinburgh
Mayfield Road
Edinburgh EH9 3JL
Scotland
tel +44 131 650 5704
fax +44 131 650 5702
Mobile  07795 203 195
[email protected]
http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs    



Peter Read wrote:
> Dear Stephen
> Do you have a reference (or better, an electronic link) to the 
> Jones-Haywood-Boucher paper?
> Best
> Peter
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Salter" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Geoengineering" <[email protected]>; "Michael Box" 
> <[email protected]>; "Jeff Ridley" <[email protected]>; 
> "Alan Gadain" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 9:23 PM
> Subject: [geo] Re: Pros and Cons of SRM geoengineering more widely
>
>
>>
>> John
>>
>> The Met. Office statement at
>>
>> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20090604.html
>>
>> did not mention that the Jones Haywood Boucher results were based on
>> treating just 3.3 % of the earth's surface.   One of the the areas
>> treated in the South Pacific off Chile and Peru.  It would be
>> interesting to know if treating the other side of the Pacific would
>> produce the opposite effect and if a judicious balance between the two
>> could achieve any desired beneficial result.  It was unfortunate that
>> this was not done.   Perhaps it soon will be.
>
> [[Snipped]]
>

-- 
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to