The cable would be parallel to the magnetic field and not rotate relative to
the magnetic field. It has to cut perpendicularly across magnetic field
lines. How does one generate current?

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Veli Albert Kallio
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 7:52 AM
To: [email protected]; Geoengineering FIPC
Subject: [geo] Re: exploit earths magnetic field


As a developer of wind farms, I am well aware of power transmission losses
being greater on underground cables then overhead cables. If that was solved
by some cable, then it would not be a problem, but I imagine that the cable
is self-destructive.
 
In any case, I would like to draw attention to fact that magnetic field is
in rapid decline and migration. The cable would be difficult to realign and
it does not generate electricity when the processes at the core switch it
off. When winding down, it becomes erratic and weak, almost multipolar
magnetic field, so as investment I would not put my bets on this.
 
Please note, the Magnetic Field Polarity Reversion Even last time occurred
870,000 years ago and since year 2000 we have fallen into this lucky
geophysical lottery to withness the onset of one which could happen almost
anytime now.
 
Group B Nations will meet President Clinton on 22. September 2009 and we
will give our version of the ongoing events: We iterate once again that the
recent migrations of the Magnetic North Pole are probably nothing to do with
any Magnetic Field Polarity Reversion event, but the constant melting and
shifting of snow and ice pack in Greenland is changing the isostatic load on
the ground, the bottom of the litosphere drumming electrically
non-conductive minerals into the electrically-active belts near the core,
the Faraday's Cage of the Earth's Core (the maxiumum outward
electrically-conductive surface where the build up of the core's static
electricity rises due to internal repulsion of electrons with same charge in
the electric field generated by the core). The more ice melts and soft ice
shifts around, the more the settled equilibrium states of the past become
unsettled, redirecting electricity to go around Greenland where there are
still good electric condutivity remaining on F-Cage.
 
So, in a situation that the melting ice sheet shutting down the electricity
trespass beneath Greenland's ice sheet and eventual flip-flopping and shut
down of magnetic field, a coil is a bad idea. A very bad idea. Our nations
will bring the reasonings to Clinton in hope he can raise interest that our
data-validation request is attended and resolved in case sea jumps and we
see the damage to the Faraday's Cage etc as precursors for ice sheet
destabilising.
 
With kind regards,
 
Veli Albert Kalio, FRGS
International Nanak Peace Price Nominee for 2008 (including the matter
referred above)
 
----------------------------------------
 
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:41:46 -0700
> Subject: [geo] exploit earths magnetic field
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> If you ran one large cable from the north pole to the south pole and
> grounded them properly, would you essentially turn the entire world
> into a dynamo? You would have a large conducter spinning around a huge
> iron core through the earths magnetic field. I know it would be the
> largest construction project ever and some would think its nuts but
> unlimited power would solve most of the problems on this planet. Even
> if the planet heated up as much as it could the power created would
> provide everything from clean drinking water to heat and cooling.
> 
> I'm not an electrical engineer but don't want to discount an idea. Any
> ideas?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to