An alternative is the turf roof http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turf_roof,
which uses evapotranspiration
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evapotranspiration for cooling.  There is also
a benefit from thermal mass http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_mass
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_mass>These are quite heavily promoted
in Europe.  I understand that they are used in Germany and occasionally in
the UK.  I think that they are more suitable than white roofing in temperate
regions.

A

2009/8/2 Alvia Gaskill <[email protected]>

>  Regarding the solar gain issue, in the northern states, the impact of
> solar heating during the winter is less due to a combination of sun angle
> and cloud cover.   In the most extreme example for the U.S., the Fairbanks,
> Alaska metro area (APX pop. 100,000) would not benefit at all from white or
> lighter covered roofs or suffer any loss in heating from having them even
> though all the heating and AC is supplied via fossil energy.  I'm not sure
> if there is any AC in Fairbanks, although temperatures do approach 90
> degrees F in July sometimes.  Residents of Seattle and parts of Oregon also
> saw temperatures over 100 degrees F this past week, but this is very unusual
> and you are correct, few homes in that part of the U.S. have AC.  They just
> don't need it very often.  I think the same analysis applies to Britain,
> especially with the large number of cloudy days.
>
> The article also makes an implied distinction between cities like NYC and
> Chicago and rural areas or cities like Minneapolis that get extremely cold
> in the winter, such cities although far enough north to require some
> additional heating during the winter if white roofs are used, are heat
> islands during the summer, less so this year due to the wayward path of the
> Polar Jet Stream.  So applications of the white roof for commercial
> buildings strategy have to take into account a number of variables.
>
> Note also that the CO2 offsets were done on a state-by-state basis, so
> states like Washington and Oregon, which get much of their electricity from
> hydroelectric power would benefit less than states like New York and
> Pennsylvania which are more dependent on coal and natural gas.  It would be
> interesting to see the same figure done including residential roofs and
> paved surfaces.
>
> I happened to go by the Sam's Club I mentioned in the article comments last
> Friday and noticed that the roof is now a gray color, somewhat worse than in
> March.  Since most commercial building roofs are flat, the only way they can
> maintain their original white color or something close to it is to have them
> cleaned periodically.  Residential roofs also lose some of the original
> lightness (not whiteness, since they are generally not white as the article
> notes), but do benefit from the rain and wind washing or blowing away dirt.
> I would like to see how many of the 3000 Sam's Club's roofs are really still
> white.  If not, then their white roof program is a public relations success,
> but a global warming failure and the people in charge of calculating the
> energy savings need to "roll back" the numbers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 01, 2009 12:09 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [geo] Ceiling the Deal
>
> I'm confused.  The diagram includes chilly Northern states.  Don't they
> need all the solar gain they can get to cut winter heating bills?  I can't
> imagine lots of people in Seattle having aircon.  In Britain hardly any
> homes have it, and most commercial buildings don't either.
> A
>
> 2009/7/30 Alvia Gaskill <[email protected]>
>
>>  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/30/science/earth/30degrees.html?_r=1
>>
>>
>>  J. Emilio Flores for The New York Times
>>
>> A Wal-Mart store in Chino, Calif., has both a cool roof and solar panels
>> to cut its energy use.
>>
>>  Jim Wilson/The New York Times
>>
>> A white roof has helped cool Jon Waldrep’s Sacramento home
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Imagining a Cool-Roof Nation]
>>  By Degrees*A Cool Shield*
>>
>> This is one in a series of articles about stopgap measures that could
>> limit global warming.
>>
>>  July 30, 2009
>> By Degrees
>> White Roofs Catch On as Energy Cost Cutters By FELICITY 
>> BARRINGER<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/felicity_barringer/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
>>
>> SAN FRANCISCO — Returning to their ranch-style house in Sacramento after a
>> long summer workday, Jon and Kim Waldrep were routinely met by a wall of
>> heat.
>>
>> “We’d come home in the summer, and the house would be 115 degrees,
>> stifling,” said Mr. Waldrep, a regional manager for a national company.
>>
>> He or his wife would race to the thermostat and turn on the
>> air-conditioning as their four small children, just picked up from day care,
>> awaited relief.
>>
>> All that changed last month. “Now we come home on days when it’s over 100
>> degrees outside, and the house is at 80 degrees,” Mr. Waldrep said.
>>
>> Their solution was a new roof: a shiny plasticized white covering that
>> experts say is not only an energy saver but also a way to help cool the
>> planet. [But what's it going to look like 5 years from now?  AG]
>>
>> Relying on the centuries-old principle that white objects absorb less heat
>> than dark ones, homeowners like the Waldreps are in the vanguard of a
>> movement embracing “cool roofs” as one of the most affordable weapons
>> against climate 
>> change<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>.
>> [Exaggeration.    This will affect climate change only on the margins.  AG]
>>
>> Studies show that white roofs reduce air-conditioning costs by 20 percent
>> or more in hot, sunny weather. Lower energy consumption also means fewer of
>> the carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to global warming.
>>
>> What is more, a white roof can cost as little as 15 percent more than its
>> dark counterpart, depending on the materials used, while slashing
>> electricity bills.
>>
>> Energy Secretary Steven 
>> Chu<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/steven_chu/index.html?inline=nyt-per>,
>> a Nobel laureate in physics, has proselytized for cool roofs at home and
>> abroad. “Make it white,” he advised a television 
>> audience<http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-july-21-2009/steven-chu>on 
>> Comedy Central’s “Daily Show” last week.
>>
>> The scientist Mr. Chu calls his hero, Art Rosenfeld, a member of the 
>> California
>> Energy Commission <http://www.energy.ca.gov/> who has been campaigning
>> for cool roofs since the 1980s, argues that turning all of the world’s roofs
>> “light” over the next 20 years could save the equivalent of 24 billion
>> metric tons in carbon dioxide emissions.
>>
>> “That is what the whole world emitted last year,” Mr. Rosenfeld said. “So,
>> in a sense, it’s like turning off the world for a year.”
>>
>> This month the Waldreps’ three-bedroom house is consuming 10 percent less
>> electricity than it did a year ago. (The savings would be greater if the
>> family ran its central air during the workday.)
>>
>> From Dubai to New Delhi to Osaka, Japan, reflective roofs have been
>> embraced by local officials seeking to rein in energy costs. In the United
>> States, they have been standard equipment for a decade at new Wal-Mart
>> stores. More than 75 percent of the chain’s 4,268 outlets in the United
>> States have them.  [In addition to the picture in the article, remember the
>> ones I took of the Sam's Club last spring.  AG]
>>
>> California<http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-400-2006-015/CEC-400-2006-015.PDF>,
>> Florida<http://ecodes.citation.com/cgi-exe/cpage.dll?pg=x&rp=/nonindx/ST/fl/st/b200v07/index.htm&sid=2009072710183304239&aph=0&cid=iccf&ref=/indx/ST/fl/st/b200v07/st_fl_st_b200v07_cover.htm&uid=icsc0418&clrA=005596&clrV=005596&clrX=005596>and
>>  Georgia have adopted building codes that encourage white-roof
>> installations for commercial buildings. [I thought the regulations REQUIRED
>> white roofs for commercial buildings.  AG]
>>
>> Drawing on federal stimulus dollars earmarked for energy-efficiency
>> projects, state energy offices and local utilities often offer financing for
>> cool roofs. The roofs can qualify for tax credits if the roofing materials
>> pass muster with the Environmental Protection 
>> Agency<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/environmental_protection_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org>’s
>> Energy Star program <http://www.energystar.gov/>.  [They can't have
>> offered it for very long.  The stimulus money was only approved in
>> February.  AG]
>>
>> Still, the ardor of the cool-roof advocates has prompted a bit of a
>> backlash.
>>
>> Some roofing specialists and architects argue that supporters fail to
>> account for climate differences or the complexities of roof construction. In
>> cooler climates, they say, reflective roofs can mean higher heating bills.
>>
>> Scientists acknowledge that the extra heating costs may outweigh the
>> air-conditioning savings in cities like Detroit or Minneapolis.
>>
>> But for most types of construction, they say, light roofs yield
>> significant net benefits as far north as New York or Chicago. Although those
>> cities have cold winters, they are heat islands in the summer, with hundreds
>> of thousands of square feet of roof surface absorbing energy.
>>
>> The physics behind cool roofs is simple. Solar energy delivers both light
>> and heat, and the heat from sunlight is readily absorbed by dark colors. (An
>> asphalt roof in New York can rise to 180 degrees on a hot summer day.)
>> Lighter colors, however, reflect back a sizable fraction of the radiation,
>> helping to keep a building — and, more broadly, the city and Earth — cooler.
>> They also re-emit some of the heat they absorb.  [Solar energy doesn't
>> deliver heat.  It is all shortwave radiation.  The heat comes from either
>> the GHG emissions of infrared or from the roor itself.  AG]
>>
>> Unlike high-technology solutions to reducing energy use, like light-emitting
>> diodes<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/l/lightemitting_diodes/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>in
>>  lamp fixtures, white roofs have a long and humble history. Houses in hot
>> climates have been whitewashed for centuries.
>>
>> Before the advent of central air-conditioning in the mid-20th-century,
>> white- and cream-colored houses with reflective tin roofs were the norm in
>> South Florida, for example. Then central air-conditioning arrived, along
>> with dark roofs whose basic ingredients were often asphalt, tar and bitumen,
>> or asphalt-based shingles. These materials absorb as much as 90 percent of
>> the sun’s heat energy — often useful in New England, but less so in Texas.
>> By contrast, a white roof can absorb as little as 10 percent or 15 percent.
>>
>> “Relative newcomers to the West and South brought a lot of habits and
>> products from the Northeast,” said Joe Reilly, the president of American
>> Rooftile Coatings <http://www.americanrooftilecoatings.com/>, a supplier.
>> “What you see happening now is common sense.”
>>
>> Around the country, roof makers are racing to develop products in the hope
>> of profiting as the movement spreads from the flat roofs of the country’s
>> malls to the sloped roofs of its suburbs.
>>
>> Years of detailed work by scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley 
>> Laboratory<http://coolcolors.lbl.gov/assets/docs/fact-sheets/Cool-roof-Q%2BA.pdf>have
>>  provided the roof makers with a rainbow of colors — the equivalent of a
>> table of the elements — showing the amount of light that each hue reflects
>> and the amount of heat it re-emits.
>>
>> White is not always a buyer’s first choice of color. So suppliers like
>> American Rooftile Coatings have used federal color charts to create “cool”
>> but traditional colors, like cream, sienna and gray, that yield savings,
>> though less than dazzling white roofs do.
>>
>> In an 
>> experiment<http://coolcolors.lbl.gov/assets/docs/PAC-2008-03-06/CoolColorsPAC-2008-03-06-team-final-slides.pdf>,
>> the National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tenn., <http://www.ornl.gov/> had
>> two kinds of terra-cotta-colored cement tiles from American Rooftile
>> installed on four new homes at the Fort 
>> Irwin<http://www.irwin.army.mil/Pages/default.aspx>
>> Army<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/a/us_army/index.html?inline=nyt-org>base
>>  in California. One kind was covered with a special paint and reflected
>> 45 percent of the sun’s rays — nearly twice as much as the other kind. The
>> two homes with roofs of highly reflective paint used 35 percent less
>> electricity last summer than the two with less reflective paint.
>>
>> Still, William Miller of the Oak Ridge laboratory, who organized the
>> experiment, says he distrusts the margin of difference; he wants to figure
>> out whether some of it resulted from different family habits.
>>
>> Hashem Akbari, Dr. Rosenfeld’s colleague at the Lawrence Berkeley
>> laboratory, says he is unsure how long it will take cool roofs to truly
>> catch on. But he points out that most roofs, whether tile or
>> asphalt-shingle, have a life span of 20 to 25 years.
>>
>> If the roughly 5 percent of all roofs that are replaced each year were
>> given cool colors, he said, the country’s transformation would be complete
>> in two decades.   [That will require regulation as old habits die hard.  I
>> have some ideas on how to fast tract this and will be reporting on it soon.
>> AG]
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to