Is Judicial Watch a right-wing loony bin, or do I have it confused with a similar name?
On Aug 20, 9:35 am, David Schnare <[email protected]> wrote: > For those who didn't get the memo, absolutely nothing you send to a > government employee (except confidentidal business information) is beyond > reach of public scrutiny. Even the majority of internal governmental memos > and emails are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. > > It isn't being "nosy" to ask what is going on inside government. Indeed, > that is the reason for FOIA. It has been the working tool for NRDC, EDF, > the Sierra Club and many others who sue the United States as a means of > keeping their lawyers employed. Same goes for the right side of the ledger. > > If you don't want your communication to a government employee made public - > - call them on the phone. > > dschnare > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Alvia Gaskill <[email protected]> wrote: > > >http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2009/OSTP_climate_respon... > > > Larry Klayman's nosy lawyers have done it again. Posting secret White > > House e-mails about geoengineering to the Internets. I guess we can add > > loss of privacy to civility and drinking water. The file is too large to > > attach and too compelling not to read! See if your name shows up! My > > favorite was the proposal to grow trees in the Sahara. Hey, we could use > > the plastic cover as mulch! > > -- > David W. Schnare > Center for Environmental Stewardship --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
