New findings that the temperature (cooling) effects of existing
aerosol pollution may be substantial and warrant serious study in the
context of large scale emissions reductions- supporting the
possibility that we are already engaged in inadvertent solar radiation
intervention at scale.

---------
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1169007/Climate-change-goal-Laws-combat-acid-rain-DRIVING-Arctic-warming-claims-Nasa.html

Mail Online
Climate change 'own goal': Laws to combat acid rain are DRIVING Arctic
warming, claims Nasa

By Cher Thornhill
Last updated at 7:16 PM on 10th April 2009

It is widely recognised that humans are their own worst enemies when
it comes to global warming.

But the latest research from Nasa suggests laws created to preserve
the environment are causing much of the damage.

Legislation to improve air quality and cut acid rain has accounted for
a shocking half of Arctic warming over the past three decades, the
space agency reports.
Enlarge   Aerosol scattering

Aerosol effect: Particles in the atmosphere reflect and absorb the
sun's rays

Climate scientist Drew Shindell of the NASA Goddard Institute for
Space Studies in New York found that declines in solid 'aerosol'
particles brought in under laws to improve air quality likely
triggered 45 per cent of temperature rises.

Aerosols - including the man-made particles sulfates and soot - have a
direct impact on climate change by reflecting and absorbing the sun's
radiation, Nasa explains.

But laws brought in by the U.S. and European countries over the past
three decades have slashed emissions of sulfates, and with them
atmospheric cooling.

[image]

The revelation shakes the theory that greenhouse gases, in particular
carbon dioxide, are the main problem in the fight to steady the
planet's climate.

Shindell said: 'There's a tendency to think of aerosols as small
players, but they're not. Right now, in the mid-latitudes of the
Northern Hemisphere and in the Arctic, the impact of aerosols is just
as strong as that of greenhouse gases.

'We will have very little leverage over climate in the next couple of
decades if we're just looking at carbon dioxide.

'If we want to stop the Arctic summer sea ice from melting completely
over the next few decades, we're much better off looking at aerosols
and ozone.'
Enlarge   Nasa graphic

Wrong target: Arctic temperatures have shot up by 1.5C since clean air
regulations were introduced

Temperatures in the North Pole are of critical concern to climate
enthusiasts.

Many believe that melting of the ice caps could lead to catastrophic
rises in sea level - even enough to rupture the Thames Barrier and
flood the capital.

For the study, Shindell and colleagues modelled the effects of carbon
dioxide, ozone and aerosols on different regions of the Earth using an
ocean-atmosphere system.

They found that aerosols made an unprecedented contribution to
warming, and that the high latitudes affected corresponded to those
that have witnessed the greatest temperature rises since 1976.

Temperatures in the Arctic have climbed by 1.5C since the 1970s - far
exceeding the modest 0.35C increase in the Antarctic, where aerosols
play a much smaller role, Nasa claims.

Two types of aerosols affected - sulfates and black carbons - are
believed to be critical players in climate change, both of which are
man-made.

Shindell said the findings make sense, explaining that the aerosols,
most of which are pumped out from the industrial regions of North
America and Europe, drift up and congregate in the Arctic.

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1169007/Climate-change-goal-Laws-combat-acid-rain-DRIVING-Arctic-warming-claims-Nasa.html#ixzz0UUuoM5HK


Kelly Wanser
Director
Silver Lining
415-734-6790
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to