Quick back and forth is the lifeblood of this group. I'm glad you realize that because that's what makes it interesting. Otherwise the interchange of information will take place at a glacial pace.
On Dec 15, 8:28 pm, Ken Caldeira <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > Several people have replied cc-ing the entire group to my poll, others > replied to me alone. > > Not surprisingly, the ones to me alone were in general more assertive about > restricting the amount of *noise *emails sent to the entire group. > > While I have yet to develop a full set of new guidelines for the New Year, I > will start a new guideline right now: > > *Anyone who recently averages more than a few posts per week to the > geoengineering googlegroup will, beyond that level, be expected to adhere to > a higher standard of information content both with respect to scope and > quality of information. > * > *Posting at an average rate approaching one per day will increase your > probability that all of your emails will be moderated, and thus delay > posting of your emails. > > For people's first post of the week, the assumption will be that it should > be posted unless there is an egregious violation of guidelines. > > For people's second post of the day, it will be a presumption that it will > be rejected unless it has high information content or is a significant > contribution to a quick back-and-forth in a single thread. > * > Best, > > Ken > > ___________________________________________________ > Ken Caldeira > > Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology > 260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA > > [email protected]http://dge.stanford.edu/DGE/CIWDGE/labs/caldeiralab > +1 650 704 7212; fax: +1 650 462 5968 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
