Hi All,
If anybody wishes to use articles published and retained in Geological Society of America's commerical database, Santa Claus has arrived! For the COP15, I needed one-off access to refute Professor Ian Plimer's dubious statistics that were to spread confusion and disarray at Copenhagen. The delegation of Professor Ian Plimer claims that scientific evidence supports ultra-high CO2 levels in the past where carbon dioxide concentrations prevailed between 300,000-400,000 parts per million. Legally, they are in their rights to supply supporting evidence. I have extreme concerns about the carbon dioxide statistics distributed by Professor Ian Plimer and I am utilising legal process for him to disclose his scientific source which he is citing. The athmospheric carbon dioxide concentration peaking in the past, somewhere between 300,000 to 400,000 parts per million, appears to me very high as currently oxygen O2 content in the air is at 210,000 parts per million. Furthermore, the Workplace Health and Safety Authority states that at concentration of 1,000 parts per million (0.1%) carbon dioxide becomes toxic and "starts affecting the powers of concentration", because of this, the schools are required to ventilate their class rooms between lessons whenever CO2 levels reaches 1,000 parts per million. I also feel, Professor of Mining Geology, Ian Plimer, should also know health and safety guidelines in place for safe levels of concentrations of: carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and methane in the coal mines. I am, therefore, concerned of Professor Ian Plimer's statistics of ultra-high carbon dioxide concentrations in the athmosphere between 300,000-400,000 as a science fraud in order to cause confusion at COP15 unless proven that he has cites some pre-existing research. If anybody knows periods when the athmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have been around 300,000-400,000 parts per million, please provide these URGENTLY to us for assistance on the above legal case. (But otherwise, I do not need the databases and GSA pay service access, so if you feel any need I am more than happy to use my credits up with them.) Veli Albert Kallio, FRGS HH Plenipotentiary Scientific Ambassador of Environmental Parliament Group, NGO. ======================================================= This message was generated automatically by a computer. There is no need to reply unless there is a problem. ======================================================= Your registration has been successfully completed for GSA Publications' Bloc of Docs. The current information in our database is: Customer Number: ***** (It is very important not to lose your Customer Number. If you ever do, please contact: Geological Society of America.) User Name: ***** First Name: ***** Last Name: ***** Email Address: [email protected] Your GSA Publications' Bloc of Docs access has been activated. If you need assistance, please contact us: Geological Society of America GSA Sales & Service 3300 Penrose Place P.O. Box 9140 Boulder, CO 80301-9140 Tel: +1-888-443-4472 or +1-303-357-1000 E-mail: [email protected] Thank you, Geological Society of America's publications Online Geological Society of America Subject: FW: Press Complaint Commission - reference: 095807 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:50 +0000 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Dear Mr Kallio, As you are aware, the Commission is currently investigating your complaint. Your complaint was sent to the Daily Express on 11 December, a reply was received on 14 December stating that the matter had been passed to the newspaper's legal team. A reply was expected within seven days. We spoke on 21 December and I explained the situation and said I would chase the newspaper for its response. This was done and I received notification that the legal advisor dealing with your concerns will be out of the office until Tuesday 29 December. I have reminded the newspaper of its obligations under the Code and shall contact it again when I return to work after Christmas (Wednesday 30 December). I do apologise for the delay but I hope this information is useful. I shall keep you up to date with any further developments. Kind regards, Rebecca Hales ----Original Message----- From: Veli Albert Kallio [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 December 2009 13:01 To: Simon Yip; [email protected] Cc: Meteorological Office Subject: Press Complaint Commission - reference: 095807 Dear Simon, RE: REQUEST FOR AN UPDATE (Your Ref. 095807) Please note that we are still awaiting the response for Daily Express, its editor and Professor Ian Plimer to provide the disclosure of their scientific sources stating that the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have been 1,000 times higher than the present 386 p.p.m. in the past, somewhere between 300,000-400,000 parts per million. As the entire front page covering article and the continuation on page 4 and also the Editorial refers to this scientific source, the newspaper is taking now a surprisingly long to discover the source for their front cover story, page 4 and the Editorial were built on. It is my understanding that in the fax to yourselves, Daily Express have acknowledged the receipt of your query and informs that their lawyers wished to review the PCC paperwork and promised their response to the Press Complaints Commission by Monday, 21.12.2009, but by now have missed this deadline by a wide margin to supply the scientific sources that state carbon dioxide having been 1,000 times higher in the past than it is at present. I reiterate my view that the given statistics are thoroughly fabricated. It is extremely unlikely Daily Express will cite a scientific, or indeed, any sources where carbon dioxide has been 38% (or ~30-40%) of the air. Therefore, the size of the atmosphere as near-infinite carbon dioxide sink is grossly misrepresented by the statistics Professor Ian Plimer provides whose integrity, despite his high academic title, must seriously be questioned by the PCC. Professor Ian Plimer states that the carbon dioxide concentrations have been 1,000 times the present CO2 level at 38% of atmospheric concentration or 386,000 parts per million which is total nonsense: If all atmospheric oxygen is burned up, this amounts only to 210,000 parts per million of 21% of the air. Already, at 1,000 parts per million (= 0.1%) carbon dioxide affects the "powers of concentration" according to the Workplace Health and Safety Authority guides. Furthermore, it is an "ages old practise" to rush children outdoors in schools and ventilate the classrooms during breaks between the classes to prevent the air in the room getting putrefied by the carbon dioxide exceeding 1,000 ppm. The Press Complaints Commission must not bury its head on sand over this like ostrich, the matter is vitally important as Professor Ian Plimer being backed up by self-created media statements was presenting himself favourably as an expert in climate change and as a delegate in Copenhagen, some of the Excellencies like the President of South Africa believing him and then becoming obstructive to emissions cuts in negotiations. There are real damage being done by these statements which the PCC simply cannot ignore or delay. The climate change denialists act like people who think that the air has infinite space for radio waves, but in reality there is a limit how much stuff you can fill in air before all radio space gets clogged up. The same applies to the atmospheric carbon dioxide carrying capacity: we as humans are treating the ocean and atmosphere as if they were infinite sinks that can take any amount of pollution we dump in them. But this is not the case. The melting Arctic permafrost, sea and sea beds now release carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxides and water vapour that have tampered with Russia's hard winter. Had Adolf Hitler in 1942 or Napoleon Bonaparte before him in 1805 had a grass green in a mid winter to welcome them at the gates of Moscow, our history would have been different. But in 2009 our "friend-turned-into-enemy", carbon dioxide emissions, prop up the temperatures where Moscow and Siberian permafrost melts and decays, releasing all its thousands, if not, millions of years old carbon dioxide and methane back to air, the initial trigger being the human releases that have caused the sea and grounds to melt in the first place. In addition, of the 2,500,000 biological organisms, it is probabilistically very unlikely that the human beings, who start feeling the toxicity of carbon dioxide at 1,000 parts per million, are the most sensitive biological organism to feel its toxic effects. It is quite conceivable, therefore, that we already see the effects of the ocean acidification killing of the organisms with calcium carbonate exoskeletons. Your acknowledgement expected with an explanation why Daily Express is not responding to any queries made over this matter to reveal their odd scientific sources behind their chief news story that was put out on the eve of the Copenhagen Climate Conference. Yours sincerely, Veli Albert Kallio, FRGS HH Plenipotentiary Scientific Ambassador, the Global Environmental Parliament Group UNGA101292 Complaint Handler on Climate Change The Group of First Nations of North America under the auspices of World Indigenous Nation's Summit (United Nations' General Assembly) International Guru Nanak Peace Prize Nominee for 2008; sea level rise risk for global security & economic stability Co-inventor of novel particle detector with Professor Gerd Binnig, the 1986 Physics Nobel Prize Winner Frozen Isthmuses' Protection Campaign of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oceans Fellow of Royal Geographical Society, London Have more than one Hotmail account? Link them together to easily access both. ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ View your other email accounts from your Hotmail inbox. Add them now. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394592/direct/01/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
