Comprehensive de-bunking of chemtrails is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory>It's a shame that no-one's been doing such experiments, as we might have learned a lot from them! A 2009/12/30 Dan Whaley <[email protected]> > > http://www.examiner.com/x-24191-Norfolk-County-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m12d30-Main-stream-media-promotes-geoengineering-as-climate-solution#comments > > Main stream media promotes geo-engineering as climate solution > December 30, 1:36 PM > Mark Andrew Riedel > > > Now that the Copenhagen climate talks have come and gone without an > agreement, (as was predicted by most, if not all, members of the 193 > country conference), certain main stream media publications have > hinted at 'alternative' climate cooling solutions. > > One of these 'suggestions' came in the August 2009 issue of National > Geographic, http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/big-idea/01/shading-earth, > stating that the earth is in need of a "planetary sunshade" consisting > of reflective particles such as sulfate, delivered by "planes, > balloons, (or) battleship guns pointed upward". > > Another 'suggestion' came from the Dec 7, 2009 edition of Newsweek > titled, "Copenhagen, Schmopenhagen" , http://www.newsweek.com/id/224595, > and originated from the same source, Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie > Institution and the Copenhagen Consensus Center. The delivery system > would work as follows: "Military planes (or helium balloons) spray > the stratophere with sulfur gases, which disperse and oxidize. The > particles scatter back into space some of the sunlight that would have > been absorbed by the planet's surface. As more sunlight is deflected, > the planet cools. It's like an artificial version of an erupting > volcano." > > These 'suggestions' seem like viable alternatives to carbon reduction > to the average reader, but there are many who have been watching the > skies over most of the industrialized world during the past decade or > so, who would like some explanation as to what has already been being > sprayed into the earth's atmosphere. > > The phenomenon known as "chemtrails" has been broadcast on video > sharing sites such as youtube and dailymotion for some time now, but > until now, most mainstreamers dismiss this topic as an exageration, or > just another conspiracy theory. The powers that be have been using > geoengineering methods without proper testing, without taking proper > safety precautions, without permission, and most importantly, without > any explanation. > > The fact that these "suggestions" occurred before the Copenhagen > summit even took place is the issue in question. It is a known fact > that the Council on Foreign Relations is a supporter of geo- > engineering. In Newsweek's article they go on to state that, "one > kilogram of sulfur could offset the effect of several hundred thousand > kilograms of carbon dioxide (and that) potential downsides (include) > regional ozone depletion, shifts in weather patterns, (and) drought." > > Now, if the CFR was really concerned about such issues, don't you > think there would be at least a conjured up explanation for > chemtrails? > > Now that the Copenhagen climate talks have come and gone without an > agreement, (as was predicted by most, if not all, members of the 193 > country conference), certain main stream media publications have > hinted at 'alternative' climate cooling solutions. > > One of these 'suggestions' came in the August 2009 issue of National > Geographic, http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/big-idea/01/shading-earth, > stating that the earth is in need of a "planetary sunshade" consisting > of reflective particles such as sulfate, delivered by "planes, > balloons, (or) battleship guns pointed upward". > > Another 'suggestion' came from the Dec 7, 2009 edition of Newsweek > titled, "Copenhagen, Schmopenhagen" , http://www.newsweek.com/id/224595, > and originated from the same source, Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie > Institution and the Copenhagen Consensus Center. The delivery system > would work as follows: "Military planes (or helium balloons) spray > the stratophere with sulfur gases, which disperse and oxidize. The > particles scatter back into space some of the sunlight that would have > been absorbed by the planet's surface. As more sunlight is deflected, > the planet cools. It's like an artificial version of an erupting > volcano." > > These 'suggestions' seem like viable alternatives to carbon reduction > to the average reader, but there are many who have been watching the > skies over most of the industrialized world during the past decade or > so, who would like some explanation as to what has already been being > sprayed into the earth's atmosphere. > > The phenomenon known as "chemtrails" has been broadcast on video > sharing sites such as youtube and dailymotion for some time now, but > until now, most mainstreamers dismiss this topic. > Chemtrail Phenemenon > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<geoengineering%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
