This seems to have been the usual sort of governance wonks, who don't realize that to make concrete governance decisions you need to know a lot about the technology and how it plays out. Until we do, there's little point to such pontificating. Much like Asilomar.
Gregory Benford On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Josh Horton <joshuahorton...@gmail.com>wrote: > AP reports on the recent SRMGI conference here: > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110403/ap_on_hi_te/eu_the_sunshade_option > > Any thoughts or impressions from those of you who might have attended? > > > Josh Horton > joshuahorton...@gmail.com > http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
