Oliver Thanks for forwarding this. I conclude BECCS is ahead of Biochar in a few senses, but Biochar is moving a lot faster. The difference has to be made up in annual, continuing benefits from Biochar - whereas BECCS has mostly costs ( except where EOR is possible). EOR must negate the carbon negativity potential of course.
Ron Sent from my iPad On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:04 AM, Oliver Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > overview page > http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/publications/global-status-beccs-projects-2010 > > full report > http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/GCCSI_Biorecro_Global_Status_of_BECCS_110302_report.pdf > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
