Dear Ken et al.
Good question.
I would allocate the money to the Arctic.  The loss of summer sea ice is real 
and happening rapidly (within a century from linear extrapolations).  I would 
devote half the money to finding out how serious the loss of summer sea ice 
would be for the ecology of
the region and the other half on research to evaluate the negatives of regional 
SRM techniques including tropospheric sulfates.  The SRM evaluation should 
include analysis of the difficulty of getting permission to do something: i.e. 
From the UN or by agreement from the countries of the region.  The first step 
would be to find out how much money is presently being spent on R&D in the 
region, e.g. on clathrates.
With best regards,
Bill

Bill Fulkerson, Senior Fellow and LERDWG Chair
Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment
University of Tennessee
311 Conference Center Bldg.
Knoxville, TN 37996-4138
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
865-974-9221, -1838 FAX
Home
865-988-8084; 865-680-0937 CELL
2781 Wheat Road, Lenoir City, TN 37771




________________________________
From: Ken Caldeira <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:08:25 -0700
To: Google Group <[email protected]>
Subject: [geo] How would you allocate US$10 million per year to most reduce 
climate risk?

Folks,

There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public funds 
available to support SRM and CDR research.

In today's funding climate, it is much more likely that someone might be given 
authority to re-allocate existing budgets than that they would actually be 
given significantly more money for this effort. Thus, the modest scale.

If you were doing strategic planning for a US federal agency, and you were told 
that you had a budget of $10 million per year and that you should maximize the 
amount of climate risk reduction obtainable with that $10 million, what would 
you allocate it to and why?

Best,

Ken

___________________________________________________
Ken Caldeira

Carnegie Institution Dept of Global Ecology
260 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
+1 650 704 7212 [email protected]
http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab  @kencaldeira

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to