Another poorly titled article. (For an excellent recent treatment on the importance of getting headlines right, see Joe Romm's recent post here: http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/06/18/247938/crappy-headline-ruins-new-york-times-story-climate-change-extreme-weather/ )
The headline should have read something more like: REDD scheme undervalues tropical forests, needs tweaking Or any of a hundred other better variations than the one they chose. D On Jun 20, 8:34 am, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote: > www.newscientist.com/mobile/article/dn20587-planting-forests-wont-sto... > > Pls excuse bare link, I'm on my phone > > A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
