Has anyone evidence for this ETC-statement? If yes, then this would be the moral hazard working. But I do not know any actual proof.
"Could geoengineering’s development/deployment negatively impact other responses to climate change? - All parties recognize that the prospect of even temporary technological fixes to climate change encourages some governments and industries to lower their (already weak) commitment to mitigation and adaptation. Further, if technological alternatives are thought to be “cheaper”, other options and funds will attract less support. There are also direct impacts on other mitigation responses, such as less effective solar power in the presence of solar radiation management techniques." [ETC proposal Nov 4. 2011, p. 12] Best Nils -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
