"The simplest way to remove carbon from the air is the planting of forests on a 
massive scale but the limitations of suitable land, water and nutrients mean it 
can only play a small part in reducing emissions. ''Estimates suggest that, at 
best, about 2 to 4 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities 
could be offset this way,'' the report said."

but >50% of annual anthro CO2 emissions is already mitigated by nature's own 
geoengineering. - G 

full report here:  http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2012/04/ops1/

Geo-engineering 'a risk' in climate change battle
April 10, 2012
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/geoengineering-a-risk-in-climate-change-battle-20120409-1wl7a.html

ATTEMPTS to slow down climate change by large-scale geo-engineering present 
''serious risks'' and are unlikely to replace the need to cut greenhouse gas 
emissions, Australia's chief scientist has warned.

In an overview of schemes proposed by scientists, researchers at the Office of 
the Chief Scientist say the main methods of planetary-scale engineering would 
confront big problems with technical feasibility, political co-operation and 
cost. But research should be pursued in the hope of developing last-ditch 
methods to slow climate change.

''Given the difficulty in implementing global action to reduce CO2 emissions 
from human activities and their continued growth, geo-engineering is one 
possible approach to combat global warming,'' it said.


''Geo-engineering would not moderate all the effects of rising emissions, and 
will introduce its own risks and uncertainties.''

Humans already play a role in dictating the Earth's climate by adding 
greenhouse gases to the atmosphere - raising carbon dioxide levels by about 40 
per cent since the Industrial Revolution - and by clearing forests to reduce 
the amount of carbon the land absorbs. But the deliberate management of global 
climate is still confined to theory, backed by a few small-scale experiments.

The report divides geo-engineering solutions to climate change into two basic 
types - plans to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and plans to block 
some of the sun's heat before it gets here.

They include fertilising the oceans with iron filings, to stimulate the growth 
of algae, which absorbs CO2 and then sinks to the ocean floor, and sowing the 
atmosphere with sulphates, which deflect some of the sun's rays away from Earth.

The simplest way to remove carbon from the air is the planting of forests on a 
massive scale but the limitations of suitable land, water and nutrients mean it 
can only play a small part in reducing emissions. ''Estimates suggest that, at 
best, about 2 to 4 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities 
could be offset this way,'' the report said.

Ocean fertilisation is also likely to be ineffective on a large scale, and the 
best estimates suggest only a few per cent of human emissions could be offset 
this way, the report concluded. This is because many marine organisms feed on 
algae, ultimately returning its CO2 to the surface, because the ocean waters 
mix together, bringing deep water back to the surface. There would also be 
unknown side effects on fish.

Like efforts to absorb more CO2, efforts to shield the planet from some of the 
sun's rays would need to be kept up more or less forever, lest there be a 
sudden surge of extra heat.

Releasing sulphate aerosols into the upper atmosphere is one method canvassed 
in the chief scientist's report. The cheapest and most effective technique of 
doing this could be connecting long tubes to a sulphate source and raising them 
into the atmosphere by means of balloons.

But the potential drawbacks are many, including reducing rainfall over land 
masses, hampering the regeneration of the ozone layer and causing acid rain. If 
the scheme failed or was stopped, temperatures would rise very quickly.

The findings of the Australian report are similar to those of recent studies 
undertaken by Britain's Royal Society and the US Task Force on Climate 
Remediation Research.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to