Hi David‹Very interesting, and just why it might be possible to do something to limit warming in an area like the Arctic, which, as was documented over and over again at the Montreal IPY meeting last week, is changing very fast.
Mike MacCracken ******** On 4/28/12 10:06 AM, "David Hawkins" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Climatic effects of 19502050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols Part 2: >> Climate response >> http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3349/2012/acp-12-3349-2012.pdf >> >> >> Reduction in air pollution from coal fired power stations due to >> environmental regulations since the 1980s has increased regional global >> warming in the Central and Eastern United States. Climate scientists from the >> Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) found that >> particulate pollution, particularly from coal fired power stations, caused a >> global warming hole, or a large cold patch reducing temperatures by up to 1 >> degree C in the region, particularly lowering maximum temperatures in Summer >> and Autumn. > > > Since I have spent a good deal of the past several decades advocating for > rapid deployment of particle reducing techniques, I guess I can be tagged as > an inadvertent geoengineer. > :>) > > Sent from my iPad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
