http://m.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/17/us-geoengineers-spray-sun-balloon?cat=environment&type=article

US geoengineers to spray sun-reflecting chemicals from balloon

Experiment in New Mexico will try to establish the possibility of cooling
the planet by dispersing sulphate aerosols

Martin Lukacs
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 17 July 2012

The field experiment in solar geoengineering aims to ultimately create a
technology to replicate the observed effects of volcanoes that spew
sulphates into the stratosphere.

Two Harvard engineers are to spray sun-reflecting chemical particles into
the atmosphere to artificially cool the planet, using a balloon flying
80,000 feet over Fort Sumner, New Mexico.

The field experiment in solar geoengineering aims to ultimately create a
technology to replicate the observed effects of volcanoes that spew
sulphates into the stratosphere, using sulphate aerosols to bounce sunlight
back to space and decrease the temperature of the Earth.

David Keith, one of the investigators, has argued that solar geoengineering
could be an inexpensive method to slow down global warming, but other
scientists warn that it could have unpredictable, disastrous consequences
for the Earth's weather systems and food supplies. Environmental groups
fear that the push to make geoengineering a "plan B" for climate change
will undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

Keith, who manages a multimillion dollar geoengineering research fund
provided by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, previously commissioned a study
by a US aerospace company that made the case for the feasibility of
large-scale deployment of solar geoengineering technologies.

His US experiment, conducted with American James Anderson, will take place
within a year and involve the release of tens or hundreds of kilograms of
particles to measure the impacts on ozone chemistry, and to test ways to
make sulphate aerosols the appropriate size. Since it is impossible to
simulate the complexity of the stratosphere in a laboratory, Keith says the
experiment will provide an opportunity to improve models of how the ozone
layer could be altered by much larger-scale sulphate spraying.

"The objective is not to alter the climate, but simply to probe the
processes at a micro scale," said Keith. "The direct risk is very small."

While the experiment may not harm the climate, environmental groups say
that the global environmental risks of solar geoengineering have been amply
identified through modelling and the study of the impacts of sulphuric dust
emitted by volcanoes.

"Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and
disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions –
potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people," said Pat
Mooney, executive director of the Canadian-based technology watchdog ETC
Group. "It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geoengineering is likely
to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict – given that
the modelling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south."

A scientific study published last month concluded that solar radiation
management could decrease rainfall by 15% in areas of North America and
northern Eurasia and by more than 20% in central South America.

Last autumn, a British field test of a balloon-and-hosepipe device that
would have pumped water into the sky generated controversy. The
government-funded project – Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate
Engineering (Spice) – was cancelled after a row over patents and a public
outcry by global NGOs, some of whom argued the project was a "Trojan horse"
that would open the door to full-scale deployment of the technology.

Keith said he opposed Spice from the outset because it would not have
improved knowledge of the risks or effectiveness of solar geoengineering,
unlike his own experiment.

"I salute the British government for getting out and trying something," he
said. "But I wish they'd had a better process, because those opposed to any
such experiments will see it as a victory and try to stop other experiments
as well."

The Guardian understands that Keith is planning to use the Gates-backed
fund to organise a meeting to study the lessons of Spice.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to