This paper provides an interesting discussion of how to calculate present value 
of CO2 mitigation, a calculation central to policy formulation and, hopefully, 
action:
http://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/09/17/document_gw_05.pdf


Abstract

In 2010, as part of a rulemaking on efficiency standards, the U.S. government 
published its first estimates of the benefits of reducing CO2 emissions, 
referred to as the social cost of carbon (SCC). Using three climate economic 
models, an interagency task force concluded that regulatory impact analyses 
should use a central value of $21 per metric ton of CO2 for the monetized 
benefits of emission reduc- tions. In addition, it suggested that sensitivity 
analysis be carried out with values of $5, $35, and $65. These estimates have 
been criticized for relying upon discount rates that are considered too high 
for intergenerational cost–benefit anal- ysis, and for treating monetized 
damages equivalently be- tween regions, without regard to income levels. We 
reestimate the values from the models (1) using a range of discount rates and 
methodologies considered more appro- priate for the very long time horizons 
associated with cli- mate change and (2) using a methodology that assigns 
“equity weights” to damages based upon relative income levels between 
regions—i.e., a dollar’s worth of damages occurring in a poor region is given 
more weight than one occurring in a wealthy region. Under our alternative dis- 
count rate specifications, we find an SCC 2.6 to over 12 times larger than the 
Working Group’s central estimate of $21; results are similar when the 
government’s estimates are equity weighted. Our results suggest that regulatory 
impact analyses that use the government’s limited range of SCC estimates will 
significantly understate potential benefits of climate mitigation. This has 
important implications with respect to greenhouse gas standards, in which 
debates over their stringency focus critically on the benefits of regulations 
justifying the industry compliance costs.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to