Greg Rau said: "I'm with you on the CO2 mining and ocean angles ... obviously 
more R&D needed for all of the above and this won't happen for free.  This 
leads me to your puzzling comment on the need for commercialization: "My own 
view on a repeat of the big American successes in public investment such as the 
Manhattan and Apollo Projects is that research could enable large scale mining 
of carbon from the air as a commercial enterprise. "  Since when were the 
Manhattan and Apollo Projects "commercial enterprises"?"

Michaelson speaks of a "Climate Change Manhattan Project... to reevaluate our 
assumptions about what environmentalism should look like."  That was the 
context.  You are right the A bomb was not profit driven, although of course 
there were big economic drivers for America's entry into WW2, and the links 
between military research and the private sector subsequently became 
prominent.  The WW2 comparison to climate change is more about required urgency 
and scale of a technological response to a security emergency.
 
The work of the United States Geological Survey in making geotechnical data 
available for free via http://minerals.usgs.gov/ is a good example of public 
research aimed at commercial objectives. Similar with government research on 
hydraulic fracturing. In terms of ocean based algae biofuel, government would 
need to assess and regulate possible sites and methods against a comprehensive 
analysis of risk and potential.  
 
NASA's Offshore Membrane Enclosure for Growing Algae program 
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/research/OMEGA/index.html is an example of 
public research that could be massively scaled up to support climate 
management, with resulting technology made available to the private sector so 
that innovation and replication could flourish.
 
Robert   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to