Hi,

I'm the author of the seawater article.  Thanks for your comments.

On whether or not its costly, I did try to construct as defensible a 
costing as possible, given that the carbon capture technology has not left 
the lab.  The cost assumptions are described through the article, and at 
the end in more detail in the Appendix on costings.  At the end of the 
introduction is a link to a spreadsheet containing the detailed cost 
calculations, so you can see what I've done.

There are many caveats, but given the assumptions, which are largely those 
of the US Navy researchers, it turns out to be surprisingly cheap.  For 
nuclear electricity generated from cheap Chinese nuclear build, the cost 
for carbon capture comes out at ~$40/tonne, and the cost of the synfuel 
derived therefrom is about 80 cents a litre.  If you think this is 
unrealistic, what would be valuable would be if you can point to errors or 
omissions in the assumptions.

Note too that the CO2 capture process is not a molecular separation from 
seawater, at least not in the sense that I think Greg meant.  CO2 is not 
separated by a membrane process, and the seawater is not passed through a 
membrane.  Instead, H+ is generated electrolytically on the membrane 
surface, and seawater is pumped *past *the membrane.  The pH drops, and the 
CO2 bubbles out of solution to be captured.  The acid stream is recombined 
with a base stream that was generated as a complement, and returned to the 
ocean.  This is a very energy efficient, and clean process.  The difference 
in power between this process and a true membrane separation process is 
huge.  And without costing it, I imagine its cheaper than solar calcining 
of limestone.

kind regards,
john

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/geoengineering/-/xSn5RetUieEJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.

Reply via email to