Hi Greg, (for some reason I did not receive your reply to me; only seeing due 
to Fred Zimmerman's post).  I hear your cynicism and share your frustration.
A few points:
To state the obvious, Congress is not a monolith.  There are still some members 
in office who believe we need policy action to cut GHGs and they are continuing 
to look for ways to force a discussion of the issue. Waxman and Whitehouse are 
among those members and this letter is an attempt to provide grist for a 
discussion.  I think it is worth the effort to provide them with thoughtful 
proposals for action.  Note that the letter emphasizes what can be done by the 
executive branch using laws that Congress already has passed, since these 
members are aware of the difficulty of enacting anything rational related to 
GHG emissions in this Congress.
For NRDC's part, a top priority Obama action using existing law would be to 
issue CO2 emission performance standards for existing fossil power plants.  The 
current Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to do this.  NRDC has developed a proposed 
approach for such standards, which is described here:
http://www.nrdc.org/air/pollution-standards/
A lengthy report and a shorter issue brief are available at the above link for 
those who want to learn more.
David

From: Fred Zimmerman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Hawkins, Dave; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [geo] Congress seeks GHG solutions

Or in Cole Porter's words, let's let Congress do that voodoo that it does so 
well.

http://www2.uol.com.br/cante/lyrics/Cole_Porter_-_You_do_something_to_me.htm

Tell me, why should it be
you have the power to hypnotize me?
Let me live 'neath your spell,
Do do that voodoo
that you do so well.
For you do something to me
that nobody else could do!

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, RAU greg 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks for the insight, Dave. So this is a post-Sandy, smoke'm out tactic to 
force the BAU folks to show their hand, and congress really isn't asking for 
solutions. "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer" - The Godfather 
Part II.  So we can just sit back and let congress continue to perform its 
special magic; I'll toss that draft response I was working on.  Other more 
productive actions we should be taking re CO2 under Obama 2.0?
-Greg

________________________________
From: "Hawkins, Dave" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Thu, January 31, 2013 11:39:32 PM
Subject: Re: [geo] Congress seeks GHG solutions

Without presuming to speak for the authors, I can assure you they are well 
aware of the threats posed by ocean acidification.  They are writing this 
letter not because the two of them have no clue about needs to be done but 
rather to promote a renewed discussion on what can be done under current law 
and where the law needs to be strengthened.  Including known opponents of any 
action in the outreach makes sense, both to avoid claims of inappropriate 
exclusion as well as to make their responses or lack thereof available for 
public scrutiny.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 31, 2013, at 11:07 PM, "RAU greg" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>>
 wrote:

The US Congress (after all of the ideas submitted by scientists, NGOs, policy 
advisors, and a few brave congress persons, Waxman among them) openly admits 
that it still hasn't got a clue what to do, while reaching out for answers to 
some of the very entities who have actively sought to kill effective GHG policy 
and legislation (see below).  Completely absent from the plea is any mention of 
ocean acidification. How this continues to elude the rationale for effective 
CO2 management further speaks to lawmakers' real or feigned disconnect from 
reality.

Anyway, here's your chance to fill them in (again).  Details and contacts in an 
info request letter here:.
http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Bicameral-Task-Force-Letter-2-Waxman-Whitehouse-2013-1-31.pdf
Comments due Feb 20.

-Greg



CLIMATE:
Waxman, Whitehouse call for ideas to tackle warming

Jason Plautz, E&E reporter

Published:  Thursday, January 31, 2013

The leaders of a congressional task force on climate change have reached out to 
more than 300 businesses and organizations -- including the nation's largest 
oil and gas companies -- to ask for their input on how the federal government 
can reduce carbon dioxide pollution.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) sent letters 
to various groups, ranging from environmental groups to labor organizations. 
The co-chairmen of the Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change said they are 
looking for advice on what each branch of the federal government can do to 
tackle climate change. That input will be shared with the White House as well 
as members of a climate change clearinghouse hosted by Sen. Barbara Boxer 
(D-Calif.) and other legislators.

"Washington is gripped in a barricade of special interests on the urgent issue 
of climate change," said Whitehouse. "That's why we want to break the Beltway 
barricade and ask a broad array of businesses, nonprofit organizations and 
academic institutions to share their ideas about actions the federal government 
can take. Climate change is already affecting all of us, and we want to get all 
ideas on the table to address it."

The 
list<http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Businesses-Organizations-Receiving-Bicameral-Task-Force-Letter-2013-1-31.pdf>
 of recipients includes the nation's largest oil, natural gas and coal 
companies; electric utilities; auto manufacturers; and defense contractors. The 
legislators also reached out to a range of environmental groups, universities 
and think tanks.

A sample 
letter<http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Bicameral-Task-Force-Letter-2-Waxman-Whitehouse-2013-1-31.pdf>
 showed that the task force is asking for "a wide range of ideas" that could 
include legislation, new regulation or actions by smaller federal agencies. 
Responses were requested by Feb. 20.

Waxman and Whitehouse launched the task force last week in order to raise the 
profile of climate change and help advise the Obama administration on how to 
use its existing authority to address the issue 
(Greenwire<http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2013/01/24/archive/5>, Jan. 24).


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:geoengineering+<mailto:geoengineering%2B>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


<Bicameral-Task-Force-Letter-2-Waxman-Whitehouse-2013-1-31.pdf>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:geoengineering%[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to