It's called FUD, and the mainstream status-quo uses a lot of FUD against those of us having proposed solutions to GW and AGW considerations.
If you want to seriously get this mainstream FUD out of the way, whereas it'll take a series of NOVA like productions and perhaps a full K-12 generation worth of public indoctrination before these geoengineering methods (all of which involve risk and/or consequences) can move forward. Do we have the support of Google NOVA or something better? On Mar 14, 11:32 am, "Keith, David" <[email protected]> wrote: > Edward A Parson and David W Keith. (2013). End the Deadlock on Governance of > Geoengineering Research. Science, 339:1278-1279, doi: > 10.1126/science.1232527<http://sfx.hul.harvard.edu/hvd?__char_set=utf8&id=doi:10.1126/science...> > > Also recently published: > David W Keith and Andy Parker. (2013). The fate of an engineered planet. > Scientific American,308:34-36. > (PDF<http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/papers/161.Keith.Parker.EngineeredP...>) > > Seehttp://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/geo.htmlfor all my solar geoengineering > pubs andhttp://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu/opeds.htmlfor some videos. > > Cheers, > David > > David Keith > Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics, > School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS); and, > Professor of Public Policy, > Kennedy School of Government, > Harvard University > [email protected]<http://www.keith.seas.harvard.edu> > > President, Carbon Engineeringwww.carbonengineering.com > > Parson-Keith-Science-2013.pdf > 241KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
