Whitehouse science advisers offer their views of (anthro?) climate change 
mitigation/management - letter here*. Adaptation ("climate preparedness") 
prominently appears as the Plan B (actually item # 1) to failed CO2 
policy/technology, ignoring the possibility of post-emissions mitigation or 
SRM. 
Under the rather dire circumstances the planet now faces and given the 
abundance 
of GE possibilities proposed, the preceding oversight seems dangerously narrow 
minded.  
-Greg
*http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_energy_and_climate_3-22-13_final.pdf



http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/03/22/pcast-releases-new-climate-report
PCAST Releases New Climate ReportToday the President’s Council of Advisors on 
Science and Technology (PCAST) released a letter to the Presidentdescribing six 
key components the advisory group believes should be central to the 
Administration’s strategy for addressing climate change.Posted by Rick Weiss on 
March 22, 2013 at 01:53 PM EDT
The 9-page “letter report” responds to a November request from the President 
for 
advice as the Administration prepares new initiatives to tackle the challenges 
posed by Earth’s changing climate. The letter calls for a dual focus on 
mitigation—reducing the pace and magnitude of climate-related changes—and 
adaptation—minimizing the unavoidable damage that can be expected to result 
from 
climate change.
“Both approaches are essential parts of an integrated strategy for dealing with 
climate change,” the letter states. “Mitigation is needed to avoid a degree of 
climate change that would be unmanageable despite efforts to adapt.  Adaptation 
is needed because the climate is already changing and some further change is 
inevitable regardless of what is done to reduce its pace and magnitude.”
The six key components are:
        * Focus on national preparedness for climate change, which can help 
decrease 
damage from extreme weather events now and speed recovery from future damage;
        * Continue efforts to decarbonize the economy, with emphasis on the 
electricity 
sector;
        * Level the playing field for clean-energy and energy-efficiency 
technologies 
by removing regulatory obstacles, addressing market failures, adjusting tax 
policies, and providing time-limited subsidies for clean energy when 
appropriate;
        * Sustain research on next-generation clean-energy technologies and 
remove 
obstacles for their eventual deployment;
        * Take additional steps to establish U.S. leadership on climate change 
internationally; and
        * Conduct an initial Quadrennial Energy Review.
To see the full letter report, please click here.
To learn about PCAST, please click here.
Rick Weiss is Assistant Director for Strategic Communications and Senior Policy 
Analyst at OSTP

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to