http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo1799.html

Sandrine Bony, Gilles Bellon, Daniel Klocke, Steven Sherwood, Solange
Fermepin & Sébastien Denvil

Nature Geoscience (2013) doi:10.1038/ngeo1799

Published online 21 April 2013

Predicting the response of tropical rainfall to climate change remains a
challenge. Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide are expected to affect
the hydrological cycle through increases in global mean temperature and the
water vapour content of the atmosphere. However, regional precipitation
changes also closely depend on the atmospheric circulation, which is
expected to weaken in a warmer world. Here, we assess the effect of a rise
in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations on tropical circulation and
precipitation by analysing results from a suite of simulations from
multiple state-of-the-art climate models, and an operational numerical
weather prediction model. In a scenario in which humans continue to use
fossil fuels unabated, about half the tropical circulation change projected
by the end of the twenty-first century, and consequently a large fraction
of the regional precipitation change, is independent of global surface
warming. Instead, these robust circulation and precipitation changes are a
consequence of the weaker net radiative cooling of the atmosphere
associated with higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, which affects the
strength of atmospheric vertical motions. This implies that geo-engineering
schemes aimed at reducing global warming without removing carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere would fail to fully mitigate precipitation changes in
the tropics. Strategies that may help constrain rainfall projections are
suggested.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to