Sorry if I'm missing a point, Mike, but - in principle - the transition
to full SRM deployment in the case of Marine Cloud Brightening
could be made at a selected rate and modified in a controllable
manner by adjusting the sea-water spray rate. Additional
flexibility is provided by varying the choices of  the locations at which 
sprayiing occurs. The same principles could be applied to sub-global MCB
geo-engineering, in the cases of coral reef protection and 
weakening of hurricanes, via propitiously chosen surface water
cooling.
All Best,   John.


John Latham
Address: P.O. Box 3000,MMM,NCAR,Boulder,CO 80307-3000
Email: [email protected]  or [email protected]
Tel: (US-Work) 303-497-8182 or (US-Home) 303-444-2429
 or   (US-Cell)   303-882-0724  or (UK) 01928-730-002
http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/people/latham
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Mike MacCracken [[email protected]]
Sent: 22 May 2013 03:17
To: Andrew Lockley; Geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] The importance of response times for various climate 
strategies - Springer

I continue to wonder how one can be so concerned about the warming that would 
occur at a supposed end of SRM and not be worried about the rapid onset of SRM 
if used in an emergency manner (not to mention that by the time of the 
emergency it may be too late to reverse (e.g., think about Greenland melting 
rate, could it be reversed?). As climate warms/changes, there is always some 
adaptation going on, so the thought of suddenly taking the global average temp 
down a degree C would likely lead to quite large disruptions and dislocations, 
just as would coming out of such a cooling. The disruption of going into SRM 
can be smoothed, and so could an exit (if we assume we have as much sense as 
needed to get agreement to start SRM), just as going in one could have a sudden 
change likely as disruptive as coming out if not managed well. So, why all the 
focus on the back end problem, without a similar concern at start-up?

Mike MacCracken


On 5/21/13 8:37 PM, "Andrew Lockley" <[email protected]> wrote:

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-013-0769-5

If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various 
climate strategies

Detlef P. van Vuuren, Elke Stehfest

Abstract

Most deliberations on climate policy are based on a mitigation response that 
assumes a gradually increasing reduction over time. However, situations may 
occur where a more urgent response is needed. A key question for climate policy 
in general, but even more in the case a rapid response is needed, is: what are 
the characteristic response times of the response options, such as rapid 
mitigation or solar radiation management (SRM)? This paper explores this issue, 
which has not received a lot of attention yet, by looking into the role of both 
societal and physical response times. For mitigation, technological and 
economic inertia clearly limit reduction rates with considerable uncertainty 
corresponding to political inertia and societies’ ability to organize rapid 
mitigation action at what costs. The paper looks into a rapid emission 
reductions of 4–6 % annually. Reduction rates at the top end of this range (up 
to 6 %) could effectively reduce climate change, but only with a noticeable 
delay. Temperatures could be above those in the year of policy introduction for 
more than 70 years, with unknown consequences of overshoot. A strategy based on 
SRM is shown to have much shorter response times (up to decades), but 
introduces an important element of risk, such as ocean acidification and the 
risk of extreme temperature shifts in case action is halted. Above all, the 
paper highlights the role of response times in designing effective policy 
strategies implying that a better understanding of these crucial factors is 
required.

This article is part of a special issue on "Geoengineering Research and its 
Limitations" edited by Robert Wood, Stephen Gardiner, and Lauren 
Hartzell-Nichols.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to