The root of Clive Hamilton's "thought" on geoengineering appeared more clearly in this interview.
When discussing the fact that The Heartland Institute and the American Enterprise Institute have endorsed geoengineering as a solution for the problem they have denied exists more emphatically than anyone else on the planet, Clive said: "They see it*—see geoengineering as a way of protecting the system, of preserving the political economic system, whereas others say the problem IS the political and economic system, and it’s that which we have to change*." And later in the interview, after Clive states that the risks to civilization that scientists such as David Keith and Alan Robock are concerned about are one thing, i.e. "*scientific risks*" whereas Clive sees an additional factor, which he calls "*political* risks", he says this: [edited to make my point clear] "*the danger that geoengineering becomes... ...a way of protecting the political economic system from the kind of change that should be necessary"* * * A way to interpret this is to say Clive wants our system of economic and political relationships as they exist* to fail* to cope with climate change in order that civilization will change in ways he thinks will make it more likely that the changed civilization will survive for a longer term. Another way to say this is he wants everyone in civilization to realize there is no way forward without a fundamental reordering of our political and economic relationships with each other, which is a necessary precursor to fundamental change. In "Green" philosophy, this lines up with those who say anything that allows this civilization to continue, such as discovering how to mitigate acid rain back in the 1980s for instance, is not the good thing it appears on the surface, because it merely allows the civilization to exist a bit longer which allows it to expand to a larger size, enabling it to do more damage to the planetary life support system, allowing it to take more of the rest of life on Earth with it as and when it collapses. Geoengineering, even removing CO2 from the atmosphere, in this line of thought, is therefore something to be opposed. If this is the root of Clive's "thought", it would throw some light on why he has taken the position in his Nature piece<http://www.nature.com/news/no-we-should-not-just-at-least-do-the-research-1.12777>, i.e. "no, we should not do the research" [into geoengineering]. On Saturday, May 25, 2013 1:12:10 AM UTC-7, andrewjlockley wrote: > > http://m.democracynow.org/stories/13653 > > Democracy Now!/ MON MAY 20, 2013/ Geoengineering: Can We Save the Planet > by Messing with Nature? > Amy Goodman interviews Clive Hamilton with some recorded clips of Shiva, Dyer, Keith, etc. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
