I think it's worth noting that the magnitude of the feedback is small. 
Their order-of-magnitude estimate is -0.01 W m-2 K-1. Locally it gets 
larger, and the idea is very interesting, but I'm not sure how 'useful' 
this could be.

On Tuesday, 2 July 2013 13:12:02 UTC+1, andrewjlockley wrote:
>
> Poster's note : This important new result shows a useful negative 
> feedback, which could be enhanced by geoengineering. Potentially, terpenes 
> etc can be manufactured artificially and released, but more likely it would 
> be simpler to use genetic engineering or selective breeding to achieve this 
> using plants. There's also a chance that natural selection might do this 
> job for us, as temperatures rise, with plants that can control temperatures 
> naturally evolving. 
>
> http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n6/abs/ngeo1800.html
>
> Warming-induced increase in aerosol number concentration likely to 
> moderate climate change
>
> Nature Geoscience 6, 438-442 (2013)
>
> doi:10.1038/ngeo1800
>
> Published online 28 April 2013
>
> Abstract 
>
> Atmospheric aerosol particles influence the climate system directly by 
> scattering and absorbing solar radiation, and indirectly by acting as cloud 
> condensation nuclei. Apart from black carbon aerosol, aerosols cause a 
> negative radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere and substantially 
> mitigate the warming caused by greenhouse gases1. In the future, tightening 
> of controls on anthropogenic aerosol and precursor vapour emissions to 
> achieve higher air quality may weaken this beneficial effect. Natural 
> aerosols, too, might affect future warming. Here we analyse long-term 
> observations of concentrations and compositions of aerosol particles and 
> their biogenic precursor vapours in continental mid- and high-latitude 
> environments. We use measurements of particle number size distribution 
> together with boundary layer heights derived from reanalysis data to show 
> that the boundary layer burden of cloud condensation nuclei increases 
> exponentially with temperature. Our results confirm a negative feedback 
> mechanism between the continental biosphere, aerosols and climate: aerosol 
> cooling effects are strengthened by rising biogenic organic vapour 
> emissions in response to warming, which in turn enhance condensation on 
> particles and their growth to the size of cloud condensation nuclei. This 
> natural growth mechanism produces roughly 50% of particles at the size of 
> cloud condensation nuclei across Europe. We conclude that 
> biosphere-atmosphere interactions are crucial for aerosol climate effects 
> and can significantly influence the effects of anthropogenic aerosol 
> emission controls, both on climate and air quality.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to