Hi Mark,

Your comments about the production of methane are very interesting.  The
group which I chair, the Arctic Methane Emergency Group (AMEG), is
concerned about all things methanical, including waste water treatment, of
which you have expertise.  If William's proposal is to sink carbon (and I
have not time at this moment to read his proposal), then it might be
advisable to promote methanotrophs at the same time.  I might be able to
discuss this tomorrow, when I get back to Bath.  I leave my hotel room in
Davos in a few minutes and then will be travelling back without any
internet access.

Cheers,

John




On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Peter Flynn <[email protected]>wrote:

> Mark,
>
>
>
> The residence time for exchange between the deep ocean and the shallow
> ocean is on the order of 600 to 1000 years. This is an average; there are
> ocean locations where the exchange is far slower (negligible downwelling
> and upwelling currents). Hence conversion of biomass to CO2 in the deep
> ocean would not liberate it to the atmosphere for a very long time, perhaps
> past the age of fossil fuels.
>
>
>
> I don’t know enough about the behavior of methane, i.e. whether it is
> soluble or would form gas bubbles. If it is soluble the same long storage
> would apply.
>
>
>
> Peter Flynn
>
>
>
> Peter Flynn, P. Eng., Ph. D.
>
> Emeritus Professor and Poole Chair in Management for Engineers
>
> Department of Mechanical Engineering
>
> University of Alberta
>
> [email protected]
>
> cell: 928 451 4455
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected]
> *Sent:* July-12-13 9:40 PM
> *To:* [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Cc:* geoengineering
> *Subject:* RE: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still
> alive at the MIT geoengineering competition
>
>
>
> Bill,
>
>
>
> At a quick glance:
>
>
>
> 1.  I did not detect your nutrient cycling or nutrient mass balancing.
>  There may be sufficient N, P, K, iron, etc. in deep water below the
> themocline.  But what fraction are you extracting?
>
>
>
> 2.  I am a wastewater engineer with some landfill and dairy waste
> experience.  Do you know what fraction of the "sunk or pumped to bottom"
> carbon is available to anaerobic bacteria?  Years ago, we used to think
> anaerobic bacteria required fresh water and mammal body temperatures to
> convert biomass to CH4 and CO2.  Now we can buy anaerobic bacteria that
> produce at 5C for use in unheated temperate climate dairy digesters.  The
> bacteria exist or evolve to work in all ocean conditions.  The gas
> production at seafloor temperatures in seawater will be slower, but not
> that much.  Perhaps 80% of volatile solids (aka ash-free biomass) hitting
> the deep seafloor should be converted to CH4 and CO2 within a decade, if
> not sooner.
>
>
>
> Mark E. Capron, PE
> Ventura, California
> www.PODenergy.org
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [geo] My big-quick-secure CO2 cleanup proposal is still
> alive at the MIT geoengineering competition
> From: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, July 12, 2013 7:15 pm
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: geoengineering <[email protected]>
>
> I looked through it in detail earlier. Where's the evidence you can get
> anywhere near the numbers you need?
>
> A
>
> On Jul 13, 2013 4:13 AM, "William H. Calvin" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I seem to be one of the three finalists in this geoengineering
> competition, despite both judges remaining dubious and dismissive. You can
> judge for yourself, as it is all at
>
>
> http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/20/planId/1302501
>
> My detailed response is in the Comment following the judges’ report. (Note
> that the revised proposal you see is not the original proposal the judges
> saw and from which I quoted in my reply Comment).
>
> The 2,000 word limit forced me to boil it down at lot but it has also
> become, I hope, a bit more understandable for those who haven't been
> following developments since 1983. A more complete proposal is in my short
> book, *The Great CO2 Cleanup*, at the Kindle store or the PDF at
> http://WilliamCalvin.org/bk16 <http://williamcalvin.org/bk16> .
>
> I have until Monday to make revisions to the proposal before final
> judging. Please email suggestions.  If you wish to add public comments or
> “Supporter” endorsements, the Comments tab has a login/register link. I am
> encouraged to “use on-line social networks” to build support, something I
> am not good at doing.
>
> This competition is my best chance so far to get a wider audience to
> consider my reframing of the climate problem and its implications for the
> time scale of needed climate actions.
>
> Thanks to many of you for earlier comments,
>
> -Bill
>
> William H. Calvin, Ph.D.
> University of Washington, School of Medicine.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to