If whales increase the ocean carbon sink (and I've got to read the fine print 
to be convinced), then the obvious geoengineering response is to breed more 
whales. And/or will whale harvesters now need to pay a carbon tax? Could 
partnering with ETC and Greenpeace on this be far behind? 
Greg



>________________________________
> From: Fred Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>To: geoengineering <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:49 AM
>Subject: [geo] sperm whales and oif
> 
>
>
>Reference: Proc Roy SocB http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0863
>
>Sperm whale poo offsets carbon by fertilising the oceans with iron
>By Ed Yong | June 16, 2010 8:00 am
>While the world wrangles over ways of reducing carbon emissions, some 
>scientists are considering more radical approaches to mitigating the effects 
>of climate change. Dumping iron dust into the world’s oceans is one such 
>strategy. Theoretically, the iron should act as fertiliser, providing a key 
>nutrient that will spur the growth of photosynthetic plankton. These creatures 
>act as carbon dioxide pumps, removing the problematic gas from the air and 
>storing the carbon within their own tissues. When the plankton die, they sink, 
>trapping their carbon in the abyss for thousands of years.
>It may seem like a fanciful idea, but as with much of our technology, nature 
>beat us to it long ago. Trish Lavery from Flinders University has found that 
>sperm whales fertilise the Southern Ocean in exactly this way, using their own 
>faeces. Their dung is loaded with iron and it stimulates the growth of 
>plankton just as well as iron dust does.
>Sperm whales are prodigious divers, descending to great depths in search of 
>prey like squid. When they’re deeply submerged, they shut down all their 
>non-essential bodily functions. Excretion is one of these and the whales only 
>ever defecate when they reach the surface. By happy coincidence, that’s where 
>photosynthetic plankton (phytoplankton) make their home – in the shallow 
>column of water where sunlight still penetrates. So by eating iron-rich prey 
>at great depths and expelling the remains in the shallows, the whales act as 
>giant farmers, unwittingly seeding the surface waters with fertiliser.
>There are approximately 12,000 sperm whales left in the Southern Ocean. By 
>modelling the amount of food they eat, the iron content of that food, and how 
>much iron they expel in their faeces, Lavery calculated that these whales 
>excrete around 50 tonnes of iron into the ocean every year.  And based on the 
>results of our own iron fertilisation experiments, the duo calculated that 
>every year, this amount of iron traps over 400,000 tonnes of carbon in the 
>depths, within the bodies of sinking plankton.
>Previously, scientists assumed that whales (and their carbon dioxide-rich 
>exhalations) would actually weaken the Southern Ocean’s ability to act as a 
>CO2 pump. But according to Lavery, this isn’t true. She worked out that the 
>whales pump out just 160,000 tonnes of carbon through their various orifices. 
>All of these figures are probably conservative underestimates but even so, 
>they suggest that sperm whales remove around 240,000 more tonnes of carbon 
>from the atmosphere than they add back in. They are giant, blubbery carbon 
>sinks.
>However, their true potential will go largely unfulfilled thanks to our 
>harpoons. Many sperm whales have been killed by industrial whalers, and the 
>population in the Southern Ocean has declined by some 90%. On the bright side, 
>the Southern Ocean’s population represent just 3% of the global total, so this 
>species may have an even greater role as a warden for carbon than Lavery has 
>suggested. Other seagoing mammals probably have a part to play too, provided 
>that they feed at depth and excrete near the surface. Several other toothed 
>whales do this, and some filter-feeding ones may do too.
>Reference: Proc Roy Soc B http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0863
>Image by Cianc
>
>---
>Fred Zimmerman
>
>Geoengineering IT!   
>Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
>GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080 
-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"geoengineering" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>email to [email protected].
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to