Hello All,

 

On similar lines, but at the political level, Millard-Ball (2012) uses game 
theory to suggest that the threat of unilateral SRM could act as a catalystfor 
more stringent abatement (whilst recognising that other outcomes such 
as trade sanctions, military action or ‘counter-geoengineering’ are also 
possible). 

 

Millard-Ball, A. (2012) The Tuvalu Syndrome: Can geoengineering solve 
climate’s collective action problem? *Climatic Change *110 (3-4) 1047-1066

 

But with the social research studies, I also think we also need to keep in 
mind factors such as the value-action gap and social desirability bias –  what 
people say they will do is not necessarily what they will do in practice, 
or they may give particular responses to fit in with what they think people 
want to hear / think it is socially acceptable to say.... 

 

All the best,

Rachel

 
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:34:41 AM UTC+2, Jesse Reynolds wrote:

>  Two other examples of anti-moral-hazard come to mind:
>
>  
>
> Geoengineering and the Science Communication Environment: A Cross-Cultural 
> Experiment
>
> Dan M. Kahan et al
>
> 2012
>
> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981907
>
>  
>
> Britain can't afford to go cool on climate change
> Guardian editorial
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/dec/03/climate-change-observer-editorial
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Jesse L. Reynolds, M.S.
>
> PhD Candidate
>
> European and International Public Law
>
> Tilburg Sustainability Center
>
> Tilburg University, The Netherlands
>
> Book review editor, Law, Innovation, and Technology
>
> email: [email protected] <javascript:>
>
> http://www.tilburguniversity.edu/webwijs/show/?uid=j.l.reynolds
>
>  
>  
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Lockley
> *Sent:* dinsdag 27 augustus 2013 1:18
> *To:* Robock
> *Cc:* Geoengineering
> *Subject:* Re: [geo] Negative moral hazard?
>
>  
>
> There are several relevant studies as you are talking about the effect 
> which underpins negative moral hazard. 
>
> The main one that's published is the UK NERC one. That's been sent to the 
> list . 
>
> My own work, and the Japanese study shown in Harvard summer school, show 
> the same effect, but they're in review atm. 
>
> I think there's one other, but I can't recall it. 
>
> A
>  
> On Aug 27, 2013 12:11 AM, "Alan Robock" 
> <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have heard that  telling people about geoengineering makes them believe 
> more in global warming.  Can someone point me to a study that shows this? 
>  Thanks.
>
> Alan
>
> -- 
> Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
>   Editor, Reviews of Geophysics
>   Director, Meteorology Undergraduate Program
>   Associate Director, Center for Environmental Prediction
> Department of Environmental Sciences              Phone: +1-848-932-5751
> Rutgers University                                  Fax: +1-732-932-8644
> 14 College Farm Road                   E-mail: 
> [email protected]<javascript:>
> New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551  USA      http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock
>                                        http://twitter.com/AlanRobock
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>
> .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to