Andrew: 1. I like the GRR suggestion - and will start using it. (unless I soon hear a good reason not to)
2. Googling says this Negative Emmissions (Emissions?) Conference has been going on for the last two days at Oxford. Can you or anyone report on any possible location for PPts, etc? Ron On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:36 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote: > After a vote at the Negative Emmission Conference it was suggested that > "Greenhouse Gas Removal" be used instead of "Carbon Dioxide Removal" > > This is to take account of the fact that methane, etc are also included in > these proposals. > > I think it's a better name, but am generally averse to new names unless > there's a good reason. On balance, I think it's worth changing. > > A > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
