Andrew,I for one applaud Ben's refusal to be drawn on governance issues --
surely we don't all need to talk about governance every time we give an
interview -- and I feel similarly positive about his willingness to use
scientific terminology! Also, remember when evaluating interviews that the
subjects sometimes have only a modest degree of control over the words that
appear once the journalist is done tightening the material for publication.
This is a short interview, I would not be surprised if there was additional
discussion that did not make it into "print".


---
Fred Zimmerman
Geoengineering IT!
Bringing together the worlds of geoengineering and information technology
GE NewsFilter: http://geoengineeringIT.net:8080


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>wrote:

> Poster's note : I found Ben's interview style interesting. For clarity, I
> think Ben is one of the finest minds in geoengineering research, and don't
> mean to criticise his professional competence or personal integrity
> whatsoever. However, a few things strike me when reading the text:
>
> 1) When considering experimentation, Ben omits consideration of the
> Russians' small scale aerosol injection experiments, or our extensive,
> practical understanding of many CDR technologies.
> 2) He does not mention that ship tracks etc. inform our understanding of
> real-world processes, without needing dedicated experiments.
> 3) He generally refuses to be drawn on governance issues, and the military
> and security aspects of geoengineering. In particular, he doesn't mention
> the body of literature developed by other researchers on those issues.
> 4) He uses scientific terminology (eg hydro cycle, sequestration, etc. )
> in the interview.
> 5) He claims that stopping emissions is a permanent solution to climate
> change. This doesn't address the issue of historic emissions, and may
> confuse some readers.
>
> http://www.countercurrents.org/ithp031013.htm
>
> What Is Geoengineering And How Does It Work?
>
> By ITHP Staff
> 03 October, 2013
>
> It shouldn't come as a surprise that planet Earth is heating up. Though
> many of us would applaud the idea of getting out our shorts and tank tops a
> few days early, we'd quickly change our minds after examining the
> consequences of global warming. Scientists looking for ways to combat
> increasing temperatures are now exploring new innovative possibilities of
> cooling the planet through modern technology.One such scientist is Ben
> Kravitz. Dr. Kravitz is part of a group of scientists researching
> geoengineering and hoping to prevent the future negative effects of global
> warming. ITHP got to interview Dr. Kravitz about his work in climate
> modeling and research. Enjoy.
>
> What is geoengineering and how does it work?
>
> That's actually a more difficult question than it sounds. But before I
> begin answering that, I want to be perfectly clear. The only research
> anyone has done on geoengineering has been using computer models or inside
> lab space.There are two broad categories of geoengineering research, which
> are known as Solar Reduction Methods (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal
> (CDR). These two technologies are really different, and they're really only
> related in that they are ways people might intervene to reduce the effects
> of global warming. SRM tries to reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches
> the planet. There are several proposed ideas, such as putting reflectors in
> space, making Earth's surface brighter, or putting a layer of sulfate
> aerosols in the stratosphere. (The last one on that list is what large
> volcanic eruptions do, and we know that volcanic eruptions can cool the
> surface.) CDR attempts to reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by
> preventing its emission or by extracting it from the atmosphere and
> sequestering it. There are other technologies that don't really fall neatly
> into either category. My expertise is in SRM, so that's what I'll focus
> on.The problem with all of those technologies is they're purely technical.
> They don't say what geoengineering is supposed to do or how much
> geoengineering would be done. Should geoengineering cool the planet by a
> certain number of degrees? Should it change the hydrological cycle? Should
> it restore sea ice? Should it prevent ocean acidification? All of these
> questions (and a lot more) need to be answered by society, not by
> scientists, before a technology or set of technologies is chosen, should
> society decide it wants to pursue geoengineering.Another problem that
> should be addressed is how geoengineering should be used. SRM is not a
> permanent "fix" for climate change. It's imperfect and temporary (blocking
> sunlight does different things to the climate than reducing CO2), and if
> SRM is suddenly stopped, the climate will rebound very quickly to a warmer
> one. The only permanent solution to climate change is to stop emitting CO2.
> Geoengineering might be used as a way of temporarily keeping temperatures
> below a dangerous level (I repeat might, since that hasn't been determined)
> while efforts to reduce climate change's effects are ramped up. But that
> too needs to be decided before geoengineering is used. Essentially, if
> society decides to start geoengineering, it needs to have a plan for when
> and how to stop.Geoengineering researchers such as myself are pursuing a
> better understanding of geoengineering in case society comes up with such a
> plan.
>
> What is your present role relating to geoengineering?
>
> I am a climate modeler, which means I take computer models of the climate
> and "ask" them what the effect of geoengineering might be if geoengineering
> is done in a certain way. I'm currently coordinating the Geoengineering
> Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), which is an organized group of
> climate modeling centers around the world who are conducting the same
> simulations of geoengineering. We've just completed a round of simulations
> in which we looked at very idealized simulations ("turning down" the sun in
> response to an increase in CO2) and a few more realistic ones involving
> stratospheric sulfate aerosols. We've just designed some new experiments
> that will look at the effects of brightening marine low clouds, like the
> kind you can see off the coast of California.
>
> What are the dangers of geoengineering? Publications such as the New York
> Times have claimed the potential consequences of geoengineering to be
> detrimental citing potential shifts in the ozone and rainfall levels being
> adversely affected?
>
> That really depends on how geoengineering is done. We're still learning a
> lot about the potential effects, and it's fair to say there is quite a lot
> we don't know. It has been shown in climate models that stratospheric
> sulfate aerosols could cause changes in ozone and precipitation patterns.
> CDR has its own risks, although I know a lot more about SRM. Even beyond
> the climatic consequences, there are many potential geopolitical
> consequences of geoengineering, on which I'm also not an expert.
> Geoengineering is a large, multi-disciplinary issue, and it's taking a lot
> of work from a lot of very smart people to figure out all of the questions
> that need to be answered.
>
> Since geoengineering most likely will affect the entire world who will
> vote on this? The United Nations? Are we waiting on a global governance
> system?
>
> I'm not an expert on the governance of geoengineering, so all I can say is
> there are a lot of very complex issues involved. Researchers can explore if
> and how geoengineering can help, but policymakers have to take the lead on
> if and how to put it into action.
>
> At present is there any form of geoengineering currently going on in the
> U.S? Most Americans by now have seen planes spraying cities with large
> contrails that can turn the entire sky white. Is this normal? As a
> scientist do you know why this spraying will happen than cease completely
> for weeks?
>
> There is no form of geoengineering currently going on in the U.S., and
> airplanes are not "spraying" anything. Contrails are basically just a
> specific type of cloud. You get them when you mix warm, moist air (jet
> exhaust) with cold, dry air (the atmosphere at those high altitudes). You
> can see the same effect on a cold day, when you can see your breath.
> Contrails form when conditions allow those clouds to form. If the
> atmosphere where the plane is flying isn't cold or dry enough, a contrail
> won't form and you won't see the plane's exhaust. But the air changes a lot
> (there are winds, and air moves around), which is why you might see a
> patchy looking contrail.
>
> What progress are other countries making such as China in controlling the
> weather?
>
> I really don't know enough about weather control to be able to answer this
> question. Geoengineering is designed to affect the climate, not the
> weather, and weather is not my area of expertise.
>
> In your opinion why are military strategists are taking a close interest
> in geoengineering?
>
> As I'm not affiliated with any military organization, I cannot say whether
> any military strategists are interested in geoengineering or why they would
> be interested.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to