True. But there has been much discussion about how to 'frame'
geoengineering research in positive way; you can look at this piece as pure
framing, divorced from specifics. The frame is not that of a victim (
'vested interests are trying to protect themselves at our expense') but of
an active participant ('get on with it!'). And what do geoengineering
researchers need from the public more than a general directive to get on
with it? Discussing specifics is probably one of those habits that prevents
scientists from framing effectively for the public anyhow. At least in this
narrow sense, sloppy is good.On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:14 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Today's Topic Summary > > Group: http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering/topics > > - 2013 North American Biochar Symposium | Harvesting Hope: The Science > and Synergies of Biochar <#141a702c0e3000e3_group_thread_0> [2 Updates] > - Terraforming Earth: Geoengineering megaplan starts now - environment > - 09 October 2013 - New Scientist <#141a702c0e3000e3_group_thread_1>[1 > Update] > > 2013 North American Biochar Symposium | Harvesting Hope: The Science > and Synergies of > Biochar<http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering/t/2cf5d1257a0d315c> > > Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> Oct 10 11:11PM +0100 > > http://symposium2013.pvbiochar.org/ > > MA, USA > > October 13-16, 2013 > > This symposium is designed for farmers, foresters, researchers, policy > makers, biochar producers and entrepreneurs, and especially students > and > citizens who want to learn about biochar as an alternative to fossil > fuel-based fertilizers/pesticides and energy. > > > > > "Ronal W. Larson" <[email protected]> Oct 10 04:58PM -0600 > > List and cc Andrew: > > I will be there for all days and will be trying to report "live" to > two other lists on latest news. Drop me a line if you would like to hear > similarly. > > About 220 expected, but numerous late "regrets" from a dozen or so > Federal employees who were told to cancel. > > Ron > > > > > > Terraforming Earth: Geoengineering megaplan starts now - environment - > 09 October 2013 - New > Scientist<http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering/t/cd0ebdf75945f752> > > Brian Cartwright <[email protected]> Oct 10 05:29AM -0700 > > Remarkably sloppy article. Claims it's urgent to spend trillions $/yr. > to > "suck CO2 out of the atmosphere" without specifying what would be done > with > it. > Brian > > On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 2:51:25 PM UTC-4, George Morrison wrote: > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Thanks, Bill Stahl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
