Hi I'm drafting a paper on the use of guns. A great deal of design considerations hinge on whether to use condensing vapors (e.g. SO3), or reactive gases (SO2, H2S). The former seem to dislike local saturation, and the latter seem to prefer it (unless I'm missing something).
Is there currently a settled view on which type of injection regime is likely to be more suitable? The use of heavy guns to distribute condensing vapours is (relatively speaking) much less appealing than their use to distribute reactive gases, which are probably best dispersed from aircraft. A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.