Hi

I'm drafting a  paper on the use of guns. A great deal of design
considerations hinge on whether to use condensing vapors (e.g. SO3), or
reactive gases (SO2, H2S). The former seem to dislike local saturation, and
the latter seem to prefer it (unless I'm missing something).

Is there currently a settled view on which type of injection regime is
likely to be more suitable?

The use of heavy guns to distribute condensing vapours is (relatively
speaking) much less appealing than their use to distribute reactive gases,
which are probably best dispersed from aircraft.

A

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to