http://www.nature.com/news/rock-s-power-to-mop-up-carbon-revisited-1.14560

Rock’s power to mop up carbon revisited
Experts push for more research into olivine weathering.

Daniel Cressey
21 January 2014

Estimates suggest that olivine could be used to sequester a significant 
proportion of carbon emissions.
Last week, a group of geoengineers met in Hamburg to discuss what on the face 
of it sounds like a very attractive idea: to soak up anthropogenic carbon 
emissions using only rocks and water. In particular, they want to help to 
mitigate climate change by crushing rocks and dropping them into the sea or 
spreading them on land. The meeting was hailed a success, but the idea is still 
far from fruition.

The ‘weathering’, or breaking down, of rocks is a hugely important but very 
slow part of the carbon cycle. Natural weathering locks up atmospheric carbon 
dioxide by means of chemical reactions between common silicate minerals and 
air. For example, when magnesium-rich olivine, a rock of particular interest to 
geoengineers, is brought together with CO2 and water under natural conditions, 
the resulting reaction forms magnesium carbonate and silicic acid, thereby 
removing and storing carbon.

But some scientists think that this natural process could be exploited to 
offset at least some of the carbon emitted by human activities. Rather than 
waiting for rocks to be slowly weathered away, olivine could be mined on an 
industrial scale, ground up, and spread over land or in the sea, speeding up 
these chemical reactions and sucking vast quantities of CO2 out of the 
atmosphere. But this presents practical problems: according to one estimate, 
you would need to spread 5 gigatonnes of olivine on beaches annually to offset 
30% of global CO2 emissions (assuming 1990 levels of emissions; S. J. T. Hangx 
& C. J. Spiers Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Contr. 3, 757–767; 2009).

At the informal meeting, about 20 enhanced-weathering experts discussed recent 
research in the area and tried to summarize and coordinate future work, for 
example by agreeing to standardize experiments. Until now, there has been no 
organized research agenda for the fledgling field, says meeting convener Jens 
Hartmann, who works on geological cycles and carbon sequestration at the 
University of Hamburg in Germany. “It was very positive; we know we are now a 
community,” he says.


Hartmann points out that humans have been exploiting rock weathering for 
decades — for example, by spreading minerals such as olivine, pyroxenes and 
serpentines as fertilizers. “The question is, can we optimize it and can we do 
it in areas we are not doing it?” he says.

As with its use as a fertilizer, olivine would have to be finely crushed to 
maximize its exposure to carbon. Olaf Schuiling, a geochemist at Utrecht 
University in the Netherlands and a passionate advocate of enhanced weathering, 
proposes spreading coarse olivine grains on beaches that experience heavy seas. 
“There the grains are tumbling around in the surf and the waves, they collide, 
they abrade each other, and produce very rapidly a lot of tiny olivine slivers 
that weather quickly,” he says.

However, there is little evidence for the practical rates of weathering that 
could be expected if large amounts of olivine or other rocks were mined and 
spread on fields or dumped into the sea. This, in turn, means it is not clear 
how much would be needed to significantly mitigate carbon emissions, how long 
it would take to work or whether it would be cost and energy efficient.

In theory, one kilogram of olivine sequesters about one kilogram of CO2, but 
the rate at which this happens can be slow. And the actual efficiency of 
sequestration will be much lower than 100%, because of the energy used — and 
emissions released — in grinding and transporting the rock. In some cases, this 
could emit more carbon than would be sequestered.

“We have good and very promising results, but there are still a lot of 
unknowns.”
Francesc Montserrat, a marine benthic ecologist at the Royal Netherlands 
Institute for Sea Research in Yerseke, is trying to pin down the figures. He is 
using small tanks to measure the weathering of olivine in various conditions — 
including the impact of worms that live in and eat the sandy sediment. 
Montserrat’s experiments will test the idea that when these worms eat tiny 
grains of olivine they also help to break down the crust that can form on 
olivine’s surface, which slows down the weathering effect.

“You need to have some hard numbers to go to the authorities to say whether it 
will be safe enough to try it out,” he says. “We have good and very promising 
results, but there are still a lot of unknowns.”

Even advocates of this method of geo­engineering admit that large-scale 
enhanced weathering is not without risk. Olivine can contain toxic heavy metals 
such as nickel that could accumulate in the environment. Grinding rocks would 
produce dust, which might harm human health. And putting olivine into the sea 
could change the pH of the water, helping to combat ocean acidification driven 
by climate change but also potentially harming marine organisms by altering 
their environment.

Phil Renforth studies carbon sequestration and minerals at the University of 
Oxford, UK, and attended the Hamburg meeting. He says that there is a pressing 
need to conduct more work on enhanced weathering given that carbon emissions 
are likely to continue to rise, and because of the current focus on dealing 
with emissions by capturing them from power stations and storing them 
underground.

“We’re putting all our eggs in one basket if we’re only looking at one method,” 
he says. There’s a real need to diversify the portfolio.”

Nature 505, 464 (23 January 2014) doi:10.1038/505464a

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to