List:

        Yesterday, I gave testimony in this week's EPA hearings on their Clean 
Power Plan.  I concentrated on just one proposed modification - that their 
present four building blocks be expanded to include a fifth on CDR/NET - half 
(?) of this list's territory.  I had planned to do this only in writing, but I 
stopped by the Denver hearings late in the day and had no trouble testifying 
quickly (and not as well as I would have liked - so I have to also write now).  
 It is possible to testify today (5 minute max) also in Denver, Atlanta and 
Washington DC  - but also in Pittsburgh on Thursday and Friday.   The fossil 
industry is in this full force.

       But mainly this note is  to suggest this is a perfect time for everyone 
on this list to make a written policy point about CDR/NET (I don't think SRM 
would qualify).  No prohibition I know of to prevent citizens of other 
countries to write.  We have until Oct. 16 (120 days after the June 18 first 
official release).

        The main point I will be making in writing is that a carbon negative 
action could be disallowed unless the rules now specifically encourage this 
fifth "negative emissions" block.  That is - CO2 removal should be as much 
encouraged as is CO2 reduction, and this should include CH4 and N2O.  I fear 
that half of the biomass carbon appearing as biochar could not receive the same 
treatment as the half that is carbon neutral.   I will not make this a biochar 
issue - rather all of CDR/NET.   I will be emphasizing the need to consider 
getting to 350 ppm (Hansen and McKibben) and the need to promote hope and 
reversibility.  I have failed to find the "negativity" concept in the written 
rules - which can be found at 
http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution-standards/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule . 
 

        There are also a huge array of requested comments in the Federal 
Register on June 18, especially around p 34839 on these "blocks".  See:  
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-06-18/html/2014-13726.htm

        I wonder if anyone else on this list is following this path to make 
CDR/NET better known at EPA?

Ron

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to